|
Author: Gretchen Kaufman, DVM
| Color Key |
|
Important key words or phrases. |
|
Important concepts or main ideas.
|
1. Introduction
When a particular species receives attention and is
tagged as threatened or endangered, certain strategies may be adopted that are
designed to save that species, or prevent its further decline. The urgency of
some of these "solutions" sometimes has precluded adequate assessment or
refinement of the particular strategy put into motion, in some cases producing
unexpected consequences, many of them involving disease. In nearly every
situation, political, social and economic factors influence the initiation and
follow through of any proposed plan and present important variables that must
be thoroughly explored to completely understand how a strategy might be
successful. Veterinarians can play a crucial role in designing, implementing,
monitoring and assessing the outcome of any given strategy because of their
unique insight into animal systems, disease and problem solving.
Some of the more common conservation strategies that
have been tried in response to declining populations are presented below.
Although these strategies are discussed separately, it should be understood
that implementation of a single strategy to save a species, or an ecosystem, is
rarely sufficient for success. Multiple strategies, aimed at multiple levels,
will produce better and swifter results. It is also important to start looking
at conservation issues from a "preventative medicine" outlook - that is
preventing these crisis from occurring in the first place, so that drastic
interventions are not necessary. Just as we see in medicine, prevention of a
conservation crisis is much simpler, cheaper, and successfully reaches more
individuals than fire-engine drastic last ditch efforts aimed at saving a dying
animal. Unfortunately, current funding is often only targeted at critically
endangered animals or habitats, and the "preventative" approach is met with
skepticism.
2. Habitat Protection
Habitat loss or degradation is generally the biggest
threat to most wildlife species experiencing serious declines all around the
world. Most of this is due to human causes - need for land for cultivation and
grazing, housing and other infrastructure required for an ever expanding
population. Many species are learning to live alongside humans in whatever
little scraps of suitable habitat they can muster. Others cannot adapt to human
disturbance or habitat disruption. One solution is habitat protection - putting
aside land for wildlife or ecosystem protection and restricting human
intervention. Habitat protection takes many forms. Sometimes this is through
the establishment of a park, preserve, conservation land, or open-space
designation. In other instances it is through legislative protection of certain
types of habitat, such as through
wetlands
protection legislation and vernal pools
certification programs or through general environmental protection,
control of domestic animals and land use restrictions.
Setting aside land or restricting land use always
carries with it a societal commitment - economic and moral choices. It is
usually prudent to promote private cooperation - develop financial incentives
for farmers and landowners to set aside land or maintain suitable habitat for
certain species; to accept a certain level of economic loss due to predation or
crop destruction; to conduct themselves in a manner that decreases wildlife
human conflicts; or to participate and develop enterprise strategies and pursue
sustainable harvesting.
Although habitat protection seems outwardly simple and
reasonable, it is not without problems and has produced new issues that now
need consideration. Some major problems include:
- Boundary or buffer zone issues including:
- animals straying out of the "park" boundaries, producing
conflicts with surrounding communities
- activities in the buffer zone affecting the protected
area (pollution, watershed changes)
- Creation of "island" populations with resultant loss of
biodiversity
- Managed forest/habitat bringing wildlife in closer
proximity to humans and their livestock
- Lack of real understanding of what a species or ecosystem
needs to maintain viability
Buffer zone or boundary conflicts often include disease
issues which bring veterinarians into the mix and may include vaccinating
wildlife (rabies), testing and removing infected animals (TB in deer) that are
threatening domestic species, or developing rational and effective management
plans that minimize conflicts (discouraging wildlife feeding or removing feed
sources such as garbage, locking up or corralling domestics at night).
Habitat protection should also include protection from
surrounding environmental contaminants. It has been repeatedly demonstrated
that environmental contamination can result in disease (heavy metals) and/or
reproduction and immunologic dysfunction (endocrine disrupters, PCBs) in both
humans and other animals. Locating a "reserve " in the middle of an industrial
wasteland, or surrounding a polluted body of water will not protect the native
species, but may hasten their demise.
One solution to the "island" dilemma is the creation of
corridors as is occurring in the Y2Y
initiative. Corridors between the islands are created to promote
migration and biodiversity of native mega fauna. Questions have arisen
concerning what the corridors will do to the spread of disease between the
"islands". How do we best prepare for this?
When domestic animals and humans are put together in
mixed use land reserves (e.g. grazing in national parks), this not only creates
an opportunity for economic conflict, but produces opportunities for
interaction and transmission of disease, and may produce an environment that
creates opportunities for development of new emerging diseases. Managed
forestry or mixed land use may however, be the most politically acceptable form
of habitat protection.
Unfortunately, our basic lack of information and true
understanding of ecosystems and species complexity is outrunning the
conservation crisis and we are still having to make decisions in the dark and
sometimes make mistakes that affect interconnecting systems. Pursuit of basic
knowledge by veterinarians, biologists, and others into baseline physiological
data; disease ecology and epidemiology; reproductive parameters; and natural
behavior are vitally important to the future success of habitat protection
strategies.
3. Species Protection
In some instances, we as a society have decided that
certain species need protection through our system of laws, treaties and
governments ( e.g. CITES and
the Endangered
Species Act). This has resulted in a myriad of legislation, always
politically impacted, and often influenced by economics. Such legislation is
inherently limiting, because it seeks to protect a specific species almost in
isolation and often does not or cannot predict long term outcomes. It is,
however, often easier to obtain support and market, especially if the species
is appealing to people - such as the giant panda or the elephant (charismatic
megafauna). In addition, symbolic protection of a keystone species or upper
level carnivore, if successful, will also protect many other animals intimately
connected to it, by requiring protection of it's food supply and it's habitat.
As veterinarians involved in such activities, we are often called upon to deal
with threatening health issues of protected species, responding to disease
outbreaks, vaccinating wildlife, screening for new diseases, and helping to
manage genetic material for optimal health.
Local, national or international regulations tied to
species protection also:
- Brings attention to the impact of illegal activities such as
sport, poaching for medicinal purposes, pets, or food (e.g. turtles and
bushmeat).
- Creates an opportunity to monitor disease
- Promotes captive breeding of protected species
- Establishes funding priorities that support research and
conservation
4. Wildlife Population Management
Conservation efforts targeting particular species
usually produce strategies for population management in a variety of settings
and on a broad scale. This is intimately tied up with species protection and
habitat protection strategies and sometimes driven by an ongoing series of
crisis, often involving human- animal conflicts and disease. Some examples
include:
- Bovine TB in deer (US) or badgers (Britain)
- TSE in Elk
- Wildlife reservoirs of rabies
- Rabies/distemper outbreaks in wild dogs (E. Africa)
- Griffon vulture mortality crisis (South Asia)
Overpopulation issues with certain species are arising
more and more due to limitations in suitable habitat because of human
encroachment. Overpopulation inevitably brings greater conflict as animals
spill out of protected habitat into human spaces, or overgraze available food
and begin degrading habitat and raiding crops. Increased disease transmission
is again a common issue. Solutions that have been explored include:
- immunocontraception
- culling (e.g. public hunting, trapping,
poisoning)
- sustainable harvesting
Population management strategies should enable
veterinarians and wildlife management professionals to monitor the health of
important populations, including reproductive health, and to respond to crisis
that may threaten certain populations. As with species protection, recognition
of population management needs establishes funding priorities that are
important to support these activities.
5. Wildlife Translocation
Wildlife translocations involve movements of animals
from one wild population to another, usually for the purpose of relieving
overpopulation pressure in the originating locations, and/or bolstering or
reestablishing populations in the destination location. Wildlife translocations
are not always done for conservation purposes. Animals are also sometimes moved
to support activities such as sport hunting and game farming and in these
situations may be mostly unregulated. This was the case with raccoons,
translocated by hunters to the midatlantic states (US) which resulted in the
spread of a new rabies epidemic in the Northeast. The emergence of TSE in elk
and mule deer in the Rocky Mountain states is alarming to many as a potential
threat to captive and wild populations and a possible source of human infection
(no evidence). Movement of captive animals has occurred without much oversight
and diagnosis of TSE may be made after the spread has already occurred. Spread
to naive wild populations may have serious consequences if captive herds are
not controlled. Emerging diseases in the Atlantic Salmon fish farming industry
has similarly produced threats to native wild fish.
|
 |
In planned wildlife translocations, veterinarians have a
clear role in ensuring the health of both the source animals and the recipient
population as well as a safe and successful transport operation. Animals to be
moved should be screened for diseases, observed for an appropriate amount of
time and necropsied whenever mortalities occur. Likewise recipient populations
should be surveyed as well to ensure success of the translocated population.
Veterinarians should be involved in the capture and transport process to ensure
safe (both human and animal) and efficient movement of animals. Health
assessments and surveys ideally should continue to be performed after
introduction to detect possible long term health problems not found in
screening processes and help to assess the overall success of the operation.
There are several inherent disease issues in this
conservation strategy. Integrating one unrelated population of animals with
another brings up major genetic questions. The native population is locally
adapted to local conditions and endemic diseases. Introduced animals may be
less suited to these local conditions and may have reduced survival. They may
also be acutely susceptible to endemic diseases and could suffer disastrous
loses when exposed. Conversely the introduced animals may benignly carry
diseases or parasites or bring genetic traits that are threatening to the
native populations.
6. Captive Breeding, Rehabilitation and Reintroduction
In some instances, habitat protection is not possible
and significant populations of a species may only exist in captive settings.
Rarely, the last remaining animals of a species are removed for the purpose of
captive protection, breeding and eventual reintroduction. Successful
conservation through this method is extremely challenging and quite
controversial. In some instances, there is no other alternative - black footed
ferrets, Guam rail, Mauritius kestrel, etc.. There are many challenges and
generally very high costs inherent in this strategy and many believe that it's
success as a strategy is very limited. Among the many pitfalls such as captive
management and captive reproductive challenges, behavioral
alterations/inadequacies in captive populations, genetic drift/inbreeding
depression there are several important health issues that must be dealt with
and are a focus of the veterinary community.
Recommendations for captive breeding/reintroduction
include (Snyder, 1996):
- maintain captive populations in isolation and as closed
collection
- conduct captive breeding in at least two separate facilities
in the normal geographic range of the species
- founder stock should be taken from the wild or from similar
single-species facilities
- captive breeding facilities should be closed to the public!
7. Ecotourism
Ecotourism outwardly appears to be a winning strategy to
bring attention to and garner support for a species or land area that otherwise
might be exploited. It can bring vital income to a struggling economy, and in
some instances provide much needed support for local communities, at the same
time helping them to appreciate the value of conservation. This strategy is not
without its problems however. Ecotourism necessarily means bringing people in
closer proximity to wildlife, building infrastructure to support those people
and changing the natural environment to facilitate the activity. It is also a
somewhat fickle economy and may not be very long lasting in the face of
political instability or market pressures. Serious disease issues may arise
through direct contact with humans (measles and influenza in gorillas), or
through the "baggage" they bring with them (dogs with distemper/rabies,
domestic cats).
The above are a few examples of the major conservation
strategies that are being practiced today. Many of these efforts overlap, and
in most instances several strategies are employed to increase the chances of
success. Disease threats and ensuring the health of fragile populations are the
responsibility of veterinarians. Veterinarians as part of a conservation team
are best equipped to design successful strategies that avoid health
catastrophes, and to respond when such catastrophes occur.
8. Highlights of Parrot Conservation
Parrots (Class Aves, Order Psittaciformes), as a group,
comprise the majority of birds in the category we commonly refer to as "pet
birds". The relationship between this group of birds and humans is a very long
and complex one, dating back centuries and involving many different cultures.
Their striking beauty and colorful variations, their charismatic personalities
and ability to "talk" and their obvious intelligence, playfulness and cunning
strike an irresistible bond with human beings. Thus they have become
inextricably entwined in our society as pets, as objects of food, adornment and
trade.
They remain, however, a group of wild birds, and cannot
in any way be considered domesticated. Over the centuries, we have not
developed a comprehensive understanding of their lives in the wild state
despite our continuous involvement with this group of birds. Now we find that
many of these precious species are at risk in their natural state: threatened,
endangered, and some on the brink of extinction.
There are 330 species of psittacine, 94 (28%) are
considered threatened in some way. This is one of the highest proportions of
any major family in the Class Aves. As a rule, they live in dense forests in
tropical regions of the world, some live in remote desert areas. They often
have complex social and survival behaviors that are largely learned behaviors.
Many of them live very long lives and have fairly low reproductive rates.
|
Critically Endangered Parrots
(IUCN) see Appendix for complete listing
|
| English name
|
Scientific
Name |
Distribution |
| Orange-bellied parrot |
Neophema chrysogaster |
Australia |
| Night parrot |
Pezoporus
(=Geopsittacus) occidentalis |
Australia |
| Kakapo |
Strigops
habroptilus |
New Zealand |
| Forbes' parakeet |
Cyanoramphus(auriceps) forbesi |
New Zealand |
| Orange-fronted parakeet |
Cyanoramphus(auriceps)
'malherbi' |
New Zealand |
| Philippine cockatoo |
Cacatua haematuropygia |
Philippines |
| Echo parakeet |
Psittacula eques |
Mauritius
|
| Puerto Rican parrot |
Amazona vittata |
Puerto Rico
|
| Lear's macaw |
Anodorhynchus leari |
Brazil
|
| Spix's macaw |
Cyanopsitta spixii |
Brazil
|
| Azure-winged parrot |
Hapalopsittaca fuertesi |
Colombia |
| Yellow-eared conure |
Ognorhynchus icterotis |
Colombia and Ecuador |
8.1. Major Threats Worldwide
8.1.1. Lack of information/understanding
The unfortunate dearth of information concerning
most parrot species has and will continue to hamper conservation efforts.
Without such information it is difficult to evaluate the true state of affairs
and provide convincing arguments for preservation. Basic biological and
ecological understanding is vital to setting up monitoring programs for
continual evaluation of threatened animals and for developing sustainable
policies to ensure their long term protection.
8.1.2. Habitat destruction/degradation
Human encroachment and environmental contamination
are obvious threats to all wildlife. Tropical regions of the globe are
currently most vulnerable due to the rapid environmental degradation that is
occurring and the high number of species (especially parrots) found in these
regions. Habitat loss is the single most important pressure facing critical
parrot populations today. Dangerous land use practices in many of these areas
include farming, mining, logging, charcoal production and urbanization.
 |
8.1.3. Trade
Trade continues to put strong pressures on the wild
parrot populations around the world. It is estimated that 10% of US households
have a parrot species as a pet. Before enactment of the Wild Bird Conservation
Act in 1992, the US was the leading importer of wild caught parrots, at times
representing 50% of the trade.
As developed nations (including the US) begin to
place restrictions on importation and trade in these species, local trade
continues to thrive and illegal markets are maintained. Laws enacted in the
countries of origin are often poorly enforced or easily circumvented. Usually
the most endangered species, rare and hard to get, are also the most valuable
(Lear's macaw chick for $40,000). This value drives the illegal market.
8.1.4. Hunting
Many indigenous peoples use the larger species of
parrots as an important source of meat and feathers. Changing cultural
preferences and development of suitable alternatives is difficult and must be
carried out very carefully and thoughtfully. Efforts at education and
redirection of native cultures to conservation concepts are ongoing.
8.1.5. Introduced predators, disease, agricultural pests,
etc.
8.1.6. SOLUTIONS to some of these problems might
include:
- Habitat preservation and protection of wild populations
- Captive breeding for trade and reintroduction programs
- Development of sustainable harvesting programs
- Ecotourism
- Education
8.2. Laws and Regulations governing pet birds
8.2.1. International legislation -
Endangered Species
The CITES (Convention on Trade in Endangered
Species) agreement is a treaty among nations to agree to restrict
trade in identified endangered and threatened species of plants and animals.
Appendix I lists endangered species including most species of
parrots. It strictly prohibits trade in these animals. Appendix
II lists threatened species and includes the remaining parrot species.
International trade in Appendix II animals is allowed only with special
permits. Appendix III includes locally identified threatened
and endangered species.
Other treaties and laws exist which control trade in
and out of each individual country. Enforcement and acceptance of these laws is
often questionable. In the face of such efforts, smuggling is still a major
threat to these birds in the wild state.
8.2.2. Federal Legislation
Most of the laws passed by the federal government
are administered by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (United States
Department of the Interior) with the help of United States Customs and APHIS
(USDA). The following laws regulate activity in birds: Lacey Act (1900),
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) with exceptions for regulated hunting, Eagle
Protection Act (1940) protects both Bald and Golden eagles, and the Endangered
Species Act (1973). Most recently, Congress passed the Wild Bird Conservation
Act (Title I of the Wild exotic bird conservation, great lakes fish and
wildlife tissue bank, fish and wildlife conservation, and African elephant
conservation, Public Law 102-440, Oct.23, 1992) which regulates the importation
of wild or non-native birds. This last bill severely restricts the importation
of wild birds, especially those intended for the pet trade. Current supplies of
exotic birds for pets now come almost exclusively from captive breeding.
What happens in an import quarantine
facility?
The current quarantine policies for importation of
birds were set in place in 1974. Importation and quarantine facilities are
either owned by the USDA, or privately owned and supervised/licensed by the
USDA or APHIS. Imported birds are kept for 30 days to screen chiefly for
Velogenic Viscerotropic Newcastle's Disease virus (VVND), an exotic disease
particularly devastating to the poultry industry. Each bird is fitted with an
"open band" with an identification number stamped on it. Treatment in
quarantine with tetracycline for psittacosis is recommended. Problems
encountered in the quarantine system include contracting other diseases, stress
induced diseases, insufficient treatment for psittacosis, and starvation due to
the unpalatability of pellets/feed, etc.
8.2.3. State Regulations
State laws governing the ownership, breeding and
selling of birds vary considerably. Every state is allowed to institute it's
own laws regarding import, sale, licensing, etc. of pet birds as long as they
do not conflict with federal laws. For example, in New York State no wild
caught birds may be sold, and all birds must be leg-banded by the breeder with
a "closed band" to prove their origin. In the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
all parrot species are allowed without restriction except for Monk, Quaker or
Gray-headed parakeets. Pink Starlings, Java sparrows (waxbill), and Red-billed
Diochs (weaver) are also prohibited. Massachusetts also honors the Endangered
Species Act (Federal), the CITES I list, the Red Book (IUCN), and protects most
native North American species. Note that CITES I species bred in
captivity in the US are not restricted.
8.3. Propagation and marketing pet birds to the
public
Most pet birds are now produced through captive
breeding due to the importation regulations in place in this country that
regulate the trade in wild birds (e.g. CITES and the
Wild Bird
Conservation Act). However, illegal importation and smuggling still
occur and the veterinarian needs to be alert to these cases. Smuggled birds are
often in poor health and can carry diseases that are normally detected during
the legal importation and quarantine procedure. Wild populations also may be
significantly impacted by illegal poaching and unregulated harvest to satisfy
the pet trade. Clients should be encouraged to purchase captive bred animals.
Pet birds are produced in a variety of breeding
situations ranging from very small hobby type operations to full scale
commercial aviaries with thousands of birds. The business of reproductive and
pediatric medicine is very sophisticated in some of the larger breeding
facilities, a few of which employ full-time veterinarians. The value of these
species is quite high, consequently the investment of professional care and
attention is considered worthwhile.
Eggs are either parent hatched or hatched in an
incubator and usually hand-raised to a certain age before shipping. Birds may
be sent directly to the buyer, or to a distributor such as a pet store. Ideally
birds are given to owners after the weaning process is complete. Some less
responsible operations sell unweaned birds and "train" the new owners to
complete the weaning process. This practice allows them to move more birds
through and thus increase their profits. These very young animals are at high
risk of developing problems with weaning or contracting infectious diseases if
not cared for by experienced people. The avian veterinary community does not
support the sale or transfer of unweaned baby birds to inexperienced persons -
AAV Policy
Statement.
9. References and Resources
9.1. Books and Articles
Beissinger, S.R. and N.F.R. Snyder (ed.) New
world parrots in crisis. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC,
1992.
Clark, Tim W. Restoration of the endangered
black-footed ferret: a 20 year overview. IN Restoration of Endangered
Species, edited by Marlin L. Bowles and Christopher J. Whelan,
Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Cunningham, Andrew A. Disease risks of wildlife
translocations. Conservation Biology 10 (2), 2996: 349-353.
Deem, Sharon L., W.B. Karesh and W. Weisman. Putting
theory into practice: wildlife health in conservation. Conservation
Biology 15 (5) 2001 : 1224-1233.
Delsink, A.K. et al. Field applications of
immunocontraception in African elephants (Loxodonta africana).
Reproduction Supplement 60, 2002 : 117-124.
Doest, Odette E.A. Macaw reintroduction to prevent
extinction: fiction or reality? Proceedings of the 21st Annual
Conference of the Association of Avian Veterinarians, Portland, Oregon,
August 30 - September 1, 2000 : 145-148.
The domestic animal/wildlife interface: issues for
disease control, conservation, sustainable food production, and emerging
diseases. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2002. Volume 969.
Enserink, Martin. US gets tough against chronic
wasting disease. Science 294 (2 Nov), 2001 : 978-979.
Forshaw, Joseph, M. Parrots of the
World. Neptune, N.J., T.F.H., 1977.
Gibbons, J. Whitfield, et al. The Global declines of
reptiles, deja vu amphibians. BioScience v.50 (8), 2000 :
653-666.
Juniper, Tony and Mike Parr. Parrots : a guide
to parrots of the world. New Haven : Yale University Press,
1998.
Krebs, JR, et al. Badgers and bovine TB: conflicts
between conservation and health. Science 279 (5352), 1998 :
817-818.
Leighton, F.A. Health Risk assessment of the
translocation of wild animals. Rev. Sci. Tech OIE 2002, 21 (1), 187-195
Musters, CJM, et al. Breeding birds as a farm
product. Conservation Biology 15 (2), 2001 : 363-369.
Quarantine and health screening protocols for wildlife
prior to translocation and release in to the wild, Woodford, M.H. ed. Office
International des Epizooties, 2001.
Salafsky, N., et al. A systematic test of an
enterprise strategy for community-based biodiversity conservation.
Conservation Biology 15 (6), 2001 : 1585-1595.
Sanz, V. and A. Grajal. Successful reintroduction of
captive-raised Yellow-shouldered amazon parrots on Margarita Island, Venezuela.
Conservation Biology, 12(2), 1998:430-441.
Schwartzman, Stephan, A. Moreira, and D. Nepstad.
Rethinking tropical forest conservation: perils in parks. Conservation
Biology 14 (5), 2000 : 1351-1357.
Snyder, N., McGowan, P., Gilardi, J. and Grajal, A.
(ed.). Parrots - Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan
2000-2004. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
link
Snyder. Noel FR, et al. Limitations of captive
breeding in endangered species recovery. Conservation Biology 10
(2), 1996 : 338-348.
9.3. Media
VIDEOTAPE: Parrots : look who's
talking. Nature Video Library, 1996.
|