MIT OpenCourseWare


» 進階搜尋
 課程首頁
 教學大綱
 教學時程
 相關閱讀資料
 作業
 研習資料
 討論群組
 下載課程

研習資料


本頁翻譯進度

燈號說明

審定:無
翻譯:林玉山(簡介並寄信)
編輯:侯嘉玨(簡介並寄信)

寫作研討會的內容同樣也可以(PDF)檔案模式取得。


寫作研討會

寫作研討會,如同另一位寫作教師曾稱之,為一個在寫作課程裡成員之間的「社團對話」,討論由小組中的一位作者所完成的一份進行中的寫作。我喜歡「社團對話」這個詞,所以我把它借來用在我們這裡。描述這個研討會,必須著重在我們全體得主動參與對話,必須強調我們每個人都得負責用一個開闊的心胸來閱讀這份討論中的原文材料,仔細並全神貫注地閱讀。接著要對作品付出我們這一份的感知力、洞察力及獨特的眼光。我們在它的張力裡看見了什麼,我們認為它的走向為何或者可以走向何處,以及我們怎麼去想一個作者為了使它能更圓滿而更進一步地寫作。就是在與作者及小組其他讀者專注的對話,或會談的過程裡所有一切的元素。

為研討會預備的第一步就是閱讀。那個方法其實跟你在課程裡的閱讀沒什麼兩樣,但有個意義重大的差異:那些出版品都是已完成的,所以你的閱讀變成從原文的內容為何以及作者如何表達其原意,來達到自己學習目標中辨識文章運作的練習。當你閱讀我們班級社團其他成員的寫作時,儘管如此,你的閱讀還是以協助作者能切入原文作品中為目的,幫助作者塑造、琢磨並精緻化。

為研討會準備,你應該要閱讀一遍將被討論的原文材料,然後再一遍地仔細讀通它。試著去找出在原文裡,對你而言在某方面看起來像是它的重心,即某事發生的地方集中了原文的焦點,並且推動它進行到某個特定的方向。然後思考你想得到但原文裡沒有答案的問題—什麼是你仍需或想要知道的?最後,提出在這篇文章裡你對作者意圖的了解,你會給作者什麼樣的建議來改進這篇文章?寫下一份簡短的註記—充分的一個段落到半頁皆可—你給作者的建議;討論他或她論文的研討會對話之後,把你寫下的回應交給作者。

我不是說你要準備你在這篇文章上必須說什麼,然後在研討會上說出來就沒事了。它離那種照本宣科還差得遠的呢,而我們不想要那樣子。相反的,這個社團對話是動態的:對話激發新的創意,改變看待或思考文章的方式,並開拓了或許在我們開始這個對談之前都沒人預知的可能性。那就是使研討會詡詡如生,並對每個參與者而言價值連城的要素。

你成為作者的第一步是把你的文章刊登在我們網站上我做好的討論留言板上。在每份作業的截止日期之前,每份作業將會再歸還給你們。你們研討會小組的成員可以接著到網站上去,把文章列印一份出來然後閱讀它。

而你成為讀者的第一步則是在作業的截止日期之前把一份簡短的回應刊登在網站上,這份作業也會發還給大家。你的回應必須是簡潔的:在仔細閱讀過後這文章中你喜歡的兩點,浮現在你腦海的兩個問題或建議。你要在你寫給作者的回應裡及在課堂研討會上,詳細說明那些簡短的評論。

當我們開始這份原文的研討時,作者要以向我們詢問問題以及等待我們的回應作為研討會的開端。而作者在研討會中最重要的角色就是聆聽。有時候,在神經質的猜想之外,作者的確說了太多他們自己的作品,同時也失去了傾聽其他人如何讀它的最重要良機。我會幫助你們試著去躲開這個陷阱。

span class="bodycopy">基本的研討會形式會要作者問下列問題:

  1. 你在我的寫作裡看到了什麼樣的優點?
  2. 對你來說我的點子或重點在這裡看起來像什麼?
  3. 在閱讀之後你還存有什麼問題?
  4. 在思考如何讓這作品變得更好的方面,你對我有什麼建議?

如果時間允許的話,讓讀者在研討會結束前,要求作者對我們的意見如何有用做個評價,以及詢問作者在接續撰寫這份文章上有什麼計劃,這樣也不錯。

我在這裡勾勒出來的形式並不是一成不變的,而是可以依我們專注在某些文章片段焦點的轉移而改變。舉個例,我可能會要求你們在研討會裡用特定的方式去思考我們正在討論的原文,或者去提出有關原文的問題,這些提問我認為可以幫助每個課堂或小組裡的作者去思考她或他自己作品的特定問題。同樣地,這個作品正在被討論的作者可能會有關於這份文章的特定問題,所以可能會問我們關於這特定領域或議題作品的回應。

研討會的過程,到時候—我們將我們的注意力聚集在手邊的原文—會隨著我們變換不定的需要而改變。有時全班會一次一起集中焦點在一位作者的作品上;其他時候你則會在小組裡一起作業,而我會輪流提供幫助及指引。然而,在研討會中還是有某些事情不會改變:

  • 氣氛必須一直是不引起爭議,且支持進行中的作品被用以當作討論對象的作者的。
  • 在我們埋頭苦幹要審慎檢視、展開嚴肅作品評論的同時,研討會必須是激勵人的(並且要記住一點,評論不是只有意指負面的批評而已,而是以評論性地眼光洞悉閱讀的成果—包括辨認出什麼寫得好,作者如何成功地體現出他或她的意圖)。
  • 研討會的「社團對話」應該要對討論中的作品提出新的見解及可能性;應該說,給作者一些動機使他能更進一步地在原文上有所作為,並且為如何修訂作品方面有所創見。
  • 沒有人可以在研討會裡搶奪發言空間;每個人都應該有同等的時間和機會去表達她或他的回應。

最後,在討論你所寫作的研討會中,你作為一位作者,應該要更意識到讀者群如何回應你的作品,應該要能感覺到煥然一新的興趣及活力再回到文章並向前繼續邁進,並且應該要有某些有關如何展開修訂過程的特定創意去達成你所要寫作的目標及抱負。

當你身為一位讀者時,研討會也能提供你:一個去學習其他作者如何著手他們的作業、如何去掌握並練習使用不僅可用在你自己和你同學的寫作上,更可以用在任何你所讀的原文材料中的評論性字彙,並且去磨練你成為一位原文評論家的技巧。

我對我們班級研討會的期許是,他們將會是專心一致的、嚴肅的、有活力的以及有創作力的,並且我會試著用這樣一個方式去協助他們-確保他們本身對每個人來說都是學習豐沃的根源。



The Writing Workshop is also available in a (PDF) format.


The Writing Workshop

The writing workshop, as another writing teacher has called it, is "a communal conversation" among the members of a writing class about a piece of writing-in-progress done by one of the writers in the group. I like the phrase "communal conversation," so I've borrowed it for our use. To describe the workshop in that way highlights that all of us participate actively in that conversation, stresses that each one of us is responsible for reading the text in question with an open mind, reading it carefully and with our full attention, and then for contributing our perceptions, insights, and visions of the piece, what we see as its strengths, where we think it is going or could go, and how we think the writer might engage further with it in order to make it more successful -- all in a process of focused dialogue, or conversation, with the writer and other readers in the group.

The first step in preparing for the workshop is reading. In that way it has much in common with your reading for the course, but with a significant difference: those published works are finished, so your reading is an exercise in discerning the operations of the text for your own purposes of learning from what it has to say and how the writer has managed to say it. When you read the writing of another member of our class community, though, your reading is aimed at assisting the writer to intervene in the text's production, to help the writer shape and hone and refine it.

In preparing for the workshop, you should read the text that is to be discussed once, and then read through it very carefully again. Try to locate the places in the text that seem to you to be in some way its centers of gravity, places where something happens which focuses the text and moves it in some particular direction. Then think about questions you have which the text does not answer -- what do you still need or want to know? Finally, given what you understand of the writer's intentions for the piece, what suggestions would you give the writer for improving this piece? Write a brief note -- a substantial paragraph to half a page -- to the writer with your suggestions; you'll give your written response to the writer after the workshop conversation on his or her essay.

I don't mean that you prepare what you have to say about the piece, and then say it in the workshop, and you're done. It's nowhere near as cut-and-dried as that, and we don't want it to be. Instead, the communal conversation is dynamic: the talk stimulates new ideas, altered ways of seeing or thinking about the piece, and opens up possibilities that perhaps none of us foresaw before we began the conversation. That's what makes the workshop lively and valuable for everyone involved.

Your first step as a writer is to post your essay on our website, in the discussion forum I have created, by the deadline each assignment will give you. Members of your workshop group can then go to the site and print out a copy of the essay and read it.

Your first step as a reader is to post a brief response on the website by the deadline the assignment will give you. Your response should be concise: two things you liked about the essay, two questions or suggestions that occurred to you after careful reading. You will elaborate on those brief comments in your written response to the writer and in the class workshop.

When we begin our discussion of the text in question, the writer will open the workshop by asking questions of us and waiting for our responses. The writer's most important role in the workshop is to listen. Sometimes, out of nervousness perhaps, writers do too much talking about their own work, and the important opportunity to hear how others read it is lost. I'll help with trying to avoid that pitfall.

The basic workshop format will be the writer asking these questions:

  1. What strengths do you see in what I've written?
  2. What seems to you to be my idea or point here?
  3. What questions remain for you after reading?
  4. What suggestions do you have for me in thinking about ways to make this better?

It is also appropriate, when time permits, for readers to ask at the end of the workshop for the writer's assessment of how useful our comments have been and what the writer's plans are for continuing to work on the piece.

The format I've outlined here is not fixed by any means, but will change as our focus of attention changes for particular pieces of writing. For instance, I might ask you during the workshop to think in a particular way about the text we are discussing, or to address particular questions about the text which I think could help every writer in the class or the group in thinking about her or his own work. Likewise, the writer whose work is being discussed might have specific questions about the piece and so might ask for our response to particular areas or issues regarding the work.

The process of the workshop, then -- the specific ways we focus our attention on the texts at hand -- will alter to meet our changing needs. Sometimes the whole class will focus on the work of one writer at a time; at other times you will work together in small groups and I will circulate to offer assistance and guidance. There are some things that must not change about the workshop, though:

  • The atmosphere must always be a safe and supportive one for writers whose work-in-progress is up for discussion.

  • The workshop must be encouraging at the same time that we strive to develop a serious critique of the work under scrutiny (and remember that a critique does not imply just negative criticism, but is the result of reading with critical insight -- including recognizing what works well, how the writer has succeeded in realizing his or her intentions).

  • The "communal conversation" of the workshop should produce new insights and possibilities for the work under discussion; should, that is, provide the writer an incentive for further engagement with the text and some concrete ideas for how to begin revising.

  • No one should usurp all the linguistic space in the workshop; everyone should have equal time and opportunity to express her or his responses.

At the conclusion of a workshop on something you have written, you as a writer should be more conscious of how a reading audience responds to your work, should feel renewed interest and energy for returning to the piece and engaging further with it, and should have some specific ideas about how to begin the process of revision to achieve your purposes and aspirations for what you are writing.

The workshop has something to offer you when you serve as a reader too: an opportunity to learn how other writers approach a task, to acquire and practice using a critical vocabulary applicable not only to your own and your classmates' writing but to any text you read, and to hone your skills as a textual critic.

My hopes for our class workshops are that they will be focused, serious, energetic, and productive, and I will try to facilitate them in such a way as to ensure that they are a rich source of learning for everyone. I count on each of you to help me in that effort.


 
MIT Home
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Terms of Use Privacy