MIT OpenCourseWare


» 進階搜尋
 課程首頁
 教學大綱
 教學時程
 相關閱讀資料
 課堂講稿
 作業

相關閱讀資料


本頁翻譯進度

燈號說明

審定:無
翻譯:黃子榮(簡介並寄信)
編輯:陳玉侖(簡介並寄信)


海洋漁棚模擬
Fish Banks Simulation

指定閱讀
Required:

新英格蘭地區漁業危機的背景資料
Background Materials on the New England Fisheries Crisis

CLF對這漁業危機的簡介(譯者補充:CLF : Conservation Law Foundation是新英格蘭地區最老的環保團體,請見http://www.clf.org/)
CLF Brief History of the Crisis

新英格蘭漁業在國家海洋大氣行政署的歷史(譯者補充:NOAA :The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/國家海洋大氣行政署,隸屬於商業部)
NOAA History of the New England Fisheries Industry

Christian科學觀察論壇
Christian Science Monitor

建議讀物
Recommended:

Layzer, Judy. 新英格蘭底棲魚類急遽減少的危機. 《環境案例》,華盛頓特區;CQ出版,2002
Layzer, Judy. "The New England Groundfish Crisis." in The Environmental Case. Washington D.C.: CQ Press, 2002.



何謂公共政策,為何我們認為我們需要"它"
What are "Public Policies" & Why Do We Need Them?

指定閱讀
Required:

Stone. 序,導讀,第一章 《公共政策的內在矛盾與政治理由》
Stone. Preface, introduction & chap. 1 in Policy Paradox.

Tanner, Jane. 〈可承受的住宅政策〉,《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002,頁81-99
Tanner, Jane. "Affordable Housing." in Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 81-99.

建議讀物
Recommended:

Reich, Robert. 導讀《公眾意見的力量》
Reich, Robert. Introduction in The Power of Public Ideas, 1988.

Orren, Gary R. 〈超出個人利益之外〉,《公眾意見的力量》之第一章Reich編著,1998
Orren, Gary R. "Beyond Self-Interest." Chap. 1 in The Power of Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988.



政府的政策工具
Tools of Government

指定閱讀
Required:

Stone. 第11,12章 《公共政策的內在矛盾與政治理由》
Stone. Chap. 11-12 in Policy Paradox.

Bettelheim, Adriel. 〈重新規劃新經濟〉, 《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002,頁257-273
Bettelheim, Adriel. "Regulating the New Economy." in Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 257-273.

Stone.第13,14,15章 《公共政策的內在矛盾與政治理由》
Stone, chap. 13-15 in Policy Paradox.

Tanner, Jane. 〈反恐戰爭的政策〉,《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002,頁275-300
Tanner, Jane. "War on Terrorism." in Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 275-300.

Josh, Kenneth. 〈積極性平權計畫〉, 《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002,頁127-144.
Josh, Kenneth. "Affirmative Action." in Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 127-144.

Glazer, Sarah. 〈評估醫師〉,《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002,頁61-79.(譯者補充: RATING DOCTORS的政策辯論主要是在討論醫師過去的行醫紀錄是否可以公佈讓人民可以主動得知醫師過去是否有醫療過失)
Glazer, Sarah. "Rating Doctors." in Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 61-79.



作為一個技術性解決問題的公共政策
Public Policy as a Technical Exercise in Problem Solving

指定閱讀
Required:

Hansen, Brian. 〈核廢料〉, 《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002,頁145-155
Hansen, Brian. "Nuclear Waste." in Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 145-155.



成本效益分析與風險評估
Cost Benefit Analysis & Risk Assessment

指定閱讀
Required:

美預算管理局的經濟分析
OMB Circular on Economic Analysis.

〈能源安全〉, 《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002,頁156
"Energy Security." in Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 156-.

Piehl, Anne, Bert Useem, and John Dilulio, Jr. 〈對三個州的獄所的成本效益分析〉, Center for Civic Innovation公民創意中心, 1999, 頁1-15.
Piehl, Anne, Bert Useem, and John Dilulio, Jr. "A Cost Benefit Analysis of Imprisonment in Three States." Center for Civic Innovation, 1999, 1-15.

建議讀物
Recommended:

Kopp, Raymond J.等人,《成本效益分析與法規制定改革》Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1997.
Kopp, Raymond J., Alan J. Krupnick, and Michael Toman. Cost Benefit Analysis and Regulatory Reform. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1997.



公共政策裡較為高尚的標準/價值
Higher "Values" of Public Policy

指定閱讀
Required:

Stone.第4,5章《公共政策的內在矛盾與政治理由》
Stone. Chap. 4 & 5 in Policy Paradox.

Masci, David,和 Patrick Marshall. 〈戰時的公民自由 〉, 《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002,頁177-195
Masci, David, and Patrick Marshall. "Civil Liberties in Wartime." in Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 177-195.

Stone. Preface,第2,3章 《公共政策的內在矛盾與政治理由》
Stone. Chap. 2 & 3 in Policy Paradox.

Glazer, Sarah. 〈社會福利改革〉, 《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002,頁101-125
Glazer, Sarah. "Welfare Reform" in Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 101-125.

建議讀物
Recommended:

〈民主論壇:權利會不會扼殺民主〉,波士頓評論,(1999年四/五月份)(譯者補充:全文在在http://www.bostonreview.net/ndf.html#Rights )
"Democracy Forum: Do Rights Handcuff Democracy." Boston Review, (April/May 1999.)

Kelman, Steven. 〈為何公眾想法重要〉,《公眾意見的力量》之第二章Reich編著,1998
Kelman, Steven. "Why Public Ideas Matter." Chap.2 in The Power of Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988.



美政府制度的本質設計?
Designing Government?

指定閱讀
Required:

聯邦論 (上網資料)
Federalist Papers [online reading]
第10篇
No. 10
第47篇
No. 47
第51篇
No. 51
第78篇
No. 78
(譯者補充:http://usinfo.org/docs/federalist/fedpapers.html )
Visit this site for the complete Federalist Papers online.

Horn, Van等其他作者,導讀,第一章《政治與公共政策》
Horn, Van, et al. Introduction & chap. 1 & 2 in Politics & Public Policy.



政策參與者與他們的政治舞台:立法者與各立法部門
The Players & Their Politics: Legislators & Legislatures

指定閱讀
Required:

Horn, Van等其他作者,第5章《政治與公共政策》
Horn, Van, et al. Chap. 5 in Politics & Public Policy.

建議讀物
Recommended:

Quirk, Paul,〈當代國會的政策制定〉,在Landy & Levin 《公共政策的新政治》之第九章,1995
Quirk, Paul. "Policy Making in the Contemporary Congress." Chap. 9 in Landy & Levin, The New Politics of Public Policy, 1995.



行政官僚系統
The Bureaucracy

指定閱讀
Required:

Horn, Van等其他作者,第4章《政治與公共政策》
Horn, Van, et al. Chap. 4 in Politics & Public Policy.

Lipsky, Michael. 〈政府中最基層的行政部門所扮演的最關鍵角色〉,《 第一線/最基層的政府官僚.》之第一章,New York: Russel Sage, 1980, 頁3-12.
Lipsky, Michael. "The Critical Role of Street Level Bureaucrats." Chap. 1 in Street Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russel Sage, 1980, 3-12.

Lipsky, Michael. 〈作為政策制定者的基層的行政部門〉,《 第一線/最基層的政府官僚.》之第2章,New York: Russel Sage, 1980, 頁3-12.
Lipsky, Michael. " Street Level Bureaucrats as Policy Makers." Chap. 2 in Street Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russel Sage, 1980, 13-25.



政策參與者與他們的政治舞台:行政首長
The Players & Their Politics: The Chief Executive

指定閱讀
Required:

Horn, Van等其他作者,第6章《政治與公共政策.》
Horn, Van, et al. Chap. 6 in Politics & Public Policy.

建議讀物
Recommended:

Heclo, Hugh. 〈議題網絡與行政部門的建立〉,《新美國政治系統》Anthony King編著. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1978, 頁 87-124.
Heclo, Hugh. "Issues Networks and the Executive Establishment. " in The New American Political System. Edited by Anthony King. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1978, pp. 87-124.



政策參與者與他們的政治舞台:法院(司法機構)
The Players & Their Politics: The Courts

指定閱讀
Required:

Horn, Van等其他作者,第7章《政治與公共政策》
Horn,Van, et al. Chap. 7 in Politics & Public Policy.

Brown與學校教育會議(譯者補充:此為著名的最高法院黑人平權運動的里程碑)
Brown v Board of Education

聯邦國家公園處,Brown與學校教育會議的網站上,同學只要閱讀"決定"與"政策執行命令"部分
National Park Service, Brown v Board of Education Web Site.
Under the heading The Case read the sections on
"The Decision" and "The Implementation Order".

同學只要閱讀Plessy v. Ferguson的意見、最高法官Harlan的不同意的意見就好
Findlaw Web Site, Plessy v. Ferguson.
Read the opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson and Justice Harlan's dissent.

Lukas, J. Anthony. 〈法官〉,《民意的共同處》之第 14章. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985, 頁222-251.
Lukas, J. Anthony. "The Judge" Chap. 14 in Common Ground. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985, 222-251.

Brown vs學校教育會議的判例在波士頓的實施狀況
Implementing Brown in Boston.

建議讀物
Recommended:

Landy & Levin. 第. 2, 3, 4章《新美國政治系統》
Landy & Levin. Chap. 2, 3, and 4 in The New Politics of Public Policy.

http://www.gse.harvard.edu/nv/features/busing09012000_page1.html
http://www.gse.harvard.edu/nv/features/busing09012000_page1.html



政策參與者與他們的政治舞台:利益團體
The Players & Their Politics: Interest Groups

指定閱讀
Required:

Horn, Van等其他作者,第3章《 治與公共政策》
Horn, Van, et al. Chap. 3 in Politics & Public Policy.

Adams, Gordon. 〈國防的企業〉,?? Hays, Vallance, & Van Tassel《美國國防政策》1997,頁151-159
Adams, Gordon. "The Business of Defense" in Hays, Vallance, & Van Tassel, American Defense Policy, 1997, 151-159.

建議讀物
Recommended:

Kelso, William. 〈多元主義的三種型態〉,《美國民主理論:多元主義與他的危機》Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1978, 頁12-29.
Kelso, William. "Three Types of Pluralism." in American Democratic Theory: Pluralism and Its Critics. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1978, 12-29.

Dahl, Robert. 《誰來管理人民》 New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 頁1961(譯者補充:經典,建議閱讀)
Dahl, Robert. Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961.

Heymann, Philip P. 第四章 《政府如何陳述整合公眾意見》 Reich編著, 1988.Heymann, Philip P. Chap. 4 in How Government Expresses Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988.

Robert Reich. 〈民主制度內的政策制定〉, 第6章《公眾意見的力量》Reich編著,1998
Robert Reich. "Policy Making in a Democracy." Chap. 6 in The Power of Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988.

Milton & Rose Friedman. 《自由的選擇》New York: Harcourt Brace, 1980.
Milton & Rose Friedman. Free to Choose. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1980.

Mills, C. Wright.《權利精英》Oxford University Press, 1956
Mills, C. Wright. The Power Elite. Oxford University Press, 1956.

Olson, Mancur. 《公眾行為的邏輯》Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965, 1971
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965, 1971.

Truman, David. 〈利益團體與國家的本質〉,《美國社會公司》 American Society Inc. M. Zeitlin.編著 New York: Markaham Publishing, 1970.
Truman, David. "Interest Groups and the Nature of the State." in American Society Inc. Edited by M. Zeitlin. New York: Markaham Publishing, 1970.



政策參與者與他們的政治舞台:大眾與媒體
The Players & Their Politics: The Public & the Media

指定閱讀
Required:

Horn, Van等其他作者,第8章《政治與公共政策》
Horn, Van, et al. Chap. 8 in Politics & Public Policy.

Downs, Anthon. 〈政策議題起伏的生態:政策議題的循環〉,《公共利益》第 28期 (1972): 頁38-50.
Downs, Anthon. "Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue-Attention Cycle." In Public Interest 28 (1972): 38-50.

建議讀物
Recommended:

Linsky, Martin. 〈媒體與公眾的深思熟慮〉,《公眾意見的力量》之第9章,Reich編著,1998
Linsky, Martin. "The Media & Public Deliberation." Chap. 9 in The Power of Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988.

Putnam, Robert. 〈導論:政治精英的比較分析研究 《政治精英的比較分析研究》 Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976, 頁2-19.
Putnam, Robert. "Introduction: The Comparative Study of Political Elites." In The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976, 2-19.

Walker, Jack. 〈對民主制度下精英理論的批評〉,《美國政治期刊》, 1966.
Walker, Jack. "A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy." In American Political, 1966.

Heifetz, Ronald, 和 Riley Sinder. 〈管理各種公共政策的解決方案〉,《公眾意見的力量》之第8章,Reich編著,1998
Heifetz, Ronald, and Riley Sinder. "Managing the Public's Problem Solving." Chap. 8 In The Power of Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988.



專案評估
Program Evaluation

指定閱讀
Required:

Howell, William, Patrick Wolf, David Campbel,和Paul Peterson. 〈教育補助券與學術表現:分析三個隨機田野調查案例〉,《政策分析管理期刊》21, No. 2 (2002): 頁191-217
Howell, William, Patrick Wolf, David Campbel, and Paul Peterson. "School Vouchers and Academic Performance: Results from Three Randomized Field Trials." In Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21, No. 2 (2002): 191-217.




 
MIT Home
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Terms of Use Privacy