|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
何謂公共政策，為何我們認為我們需要"它"
1:What Is Public
Policy and Why do
We Think We Need
It ? |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
課程介紹
Introduction to the Course |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
海底漁棚議題的政策模擬 (譯者補充:講授者以實際的政策問題作為此課程的開端)
Fish Banks Simulation |
|
|
指定閱讀:
Required:
新英格蘭地區漁業危機的背景資料
Background Materials on the New England Fisheries Crisis
CLF對這漁業危機的簡介(譯者補充：CLF ：Conservation Law Foundation是新英格蘭地區最老的環保團體，請見http://www.clf.org/)
CLF Brief History of the Crisis
新英格蘭漁業在國家海洋大氣行政署的歷史
(譯者補充：NOAA：The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration/國家海洋大氣行政署，隸屬於商業部)
NOAA History of the New England Fisheries Industry
Christian科學觀察論壇
Christian Science Monitor
建議讀物
Recommended:
Layzer， Judy. 〈新英格蘭底棲魚類急遽減少的危機〉. 《環境案例》，華盛頓特區;CQ出版，2002
Layzer, Judy. "The New England Groundfish Crisis." In The Environmental Case. Washington D.C.: CQ Press, 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
海底漁棚議題的政策模擬(續)
Fish Banks Simulation (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
何謂公共政策，為何我們認為我們需要"它"
What are "Public
Policies" & Why Do We Need Them?
|
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Stone. 序，導讀，第一章 《公共政策的內在矛盾與政治理由》
Stone. Preface, introduction & chap. 1 in Policy Paradox.
建議讀物
Recommended:
Reich， Robert. 導讀《公眾意見的力量》
Reich, Robert. Introduction in The Power of Public Ideas, 1988.
Orren， Gary R. 〈超出個人利益之外〉，《公眾意見的力量》的第一章，Reich編，1988
Orren, Gary R. "Beyond Self-Interest." Chap. 1 in The Power of Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
何謂公共政策，為何我們認為我們需要"它"
What are "Public Policies" & Why Do We Need Them? |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Tanner， Jane. 〈可承受的住宅政策〉，《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002，頁81-99
Tanner, Jane. "Affordable Housing." In Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 81-99.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
我們應如何制定公共政策
2:How should We Make Public Policy? |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
政府的政策工具
Tools of Government |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Stone.第11，12章《公共政策的內在矛盾與政治理由》
Stone. Chap. 11-12 in Policy Paradox.
Bettelheim， Adriel.〈重新規劃新經濟〉， 《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002，頁257-273
Bettelheim, Adriel. "Regulating the New Economy." In Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 257-273.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
政府的政策工具
Tools of Government |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Stone.第13，14，15章 《公共政策的內在矛盾與政治理由》
Stone, chap. 13-15 in Policy Paradox.
Tanner， Jane.〈反恐戰爭的政策〉，《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002，頁275-300
Tanner, Jane. "War on Terrorism." In Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 275-300.
Josh， Kenneth. 〈積極性平權計畫〉，《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002，頁127-144.
Josh, Kenneth. "Affirmative Action." In Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 127-144.
Glazer， Sarah. 〈評估醫師〉，《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002，頁61-79.
(譯者補充: RATING DOCTORS的政策辯論主要是在討論醫師過去的行醫紀錄是否可以公佈讓人民可以主動得知醫師過去是否有醫療過失)
Glazer, Sarah. "Rating Doctors." In Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 61-79. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
作為一個技術性解決問題的公共政策
Public Policy as a Technical Exercise in Problem Solving |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Hansen， Brian.〈核廢料〉，《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002，頁145-155
Hansen, Brian. "Nuclear Waste." In Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 145-155. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
成本效益分析與風險評估
Cost Benefit Analysis & Risk Assessment |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
美預算管理局的經濟分析
OMB Circular on Economic Analysis.
〈能源安全〉， 《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002，頁156
"Energy Security." In Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 156-.
建議讀物
Recommended:
Kopp， Raymond J.等人，《成本效益分析與法規制定改革》，Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future， 1997.
Kopp, Raymond J., Alan J. Krupnick, and Michael Toman. Cost Benefit Analysis and Regulatory Reform. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1997. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
繳交第一份報告的草稿
1st Draft of Paper #1 due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
公共政策裡較為高尚的標準／價值
Higher "Values" of Public Policy |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Stone.第4，5章 《公共政策的內在矛盾與政治理由》
Stone. Chap. 4 & 5 in Policy Paradox.
Masci， David， 和 Patrick Marshall. 〈戰時的公民自由〉， 《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002，頁177-195
Masci, David, and Patrick Marshall. "Civil Liberties in Wartime." In Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 177-195.
建議讀物
Recommended:
〈民主論壇:權利會不會扼殺民主〉，波士頓評論，(1999年四/五月份)
(譯者補充：全文在在http://www.bostonreview.net/ndf.html#Rights )
"Democracy Forum: Do Rights Handcuff Democracy." Boston Review, (April/May 1999.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
公共政策裡較為高尚的標準／價值
Higher "Values" of Public Policy (continues) |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Stone.第2，3章 《公共政策的內在矛盾與政治理由》
Stone. Chap. 2 & 3 in Policy Paradox.
Glazer， Sarah. 〈社會福利改革〉， 《美國公共政策辯論議題》2002，頁101-125
Glazer, Sarah. "Welfare Reform." In Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 101-125.
建議讀物
Recommended:
Kelman， Steven. 〈為何公眾想法重要〉，《公眾意見的力量》的第二章，Reich編著，1998
Kelman, Steven. "Why Public Ideas Matter." Chap.2 in The Power of Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
誰參與制定公共政策
3:Who Makes Public Policy? |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
美政府制度的本質設計?
Designing Government? |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
聯邦論 (上網資料)
Federalist Papers [online reading]
第10篇
No. 10
第47篇
No. 47
第51篇
No. 51
第78篇
No. 78
(譯者補充:http://usinfo.org/docs/federalist/fedpapers.html )
Visit this site for the complete Federalist Papers online.
Horn， Van等其他作者，導讀，第一章《政治與公共政策》
Horn, Van, et al. Introduction & chap. 1 & 2 in Politics & Public Policy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
繳交第一份報告的修正本
Revised Paper #1 due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
政策參與者與他們的政治舞台：立法者與各立法部門
The Players & Their Politics: Legislators & Legislatures |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Horn， Van等其他作者，第5章《政治與公共政策》
Horn, Van, et al. Chap. 5 in Politics & Public Policy.
建議讀物
Recommended:
Quirk， Paul，〈當代國會的政策制定〉，，在Landy & Levin，《公共政策的新政治》的第九章，1995
Quirk, Paul. "Policy Making in the Contemporary Congress." Chap. 9 in Landy & Levin, The New Politics of Public Policy, 1995. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
政策參與者與他們的政治舞台:立法者與各立法部門
The Players & Their Politics: Legislators & Legislatures (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
行政官僚系統
The Bureaucracy |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Horn， Van等其他作者，第4章《政治與公共政策》
Horn, Van, et al. Chap. 4 in Politics & Public Policy.
Lipsky， Michael.〈政府中最基層的行政部門所扮演的最關鍵角色〉，《第一線／最基層的政府官僚》的第一章，New York: Russel Sage， 1980， 頁3-12.
Lipsky, Michael. "The Critical Role of Street Level Bureaucrats." Chap. 1 in Street Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russel Sage, 1980, 3-12.
Lipsky， Michael.〈作為政策制定者的基層行政部門〉，《 第一線／最基層的政府官僚》的第二章，New York: Russel Sage， 1980， 頁3-12.
Lipsky, Michael. " Street Level Bureaucrats as Policy Makers." Chap. 2 in Street Level Bureaucracy. New York: Russel Sage, 1980, 13-25. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
政策參與者與他們的政治舞台：行政首長
The Players & Their Politics: The Chief Executive |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Horn， Van等其他作者，第6章
Horn, Van, et al. Chap. 6 in Politics & Public Policy.
《政治與公共政策》
建議讀物
Recommended:
Heclo， Hugh. 〈議題網絡與行政部門的建立〉，《新美國政治系統》Anthony King編著. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute， 1978， 頁 87-124.
Heclo, Hugh. "Issues Networks and the Executive Establishment. " In The New American Political System. Edited by Anthony King. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1978, pp. 87-124. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
政策參與者與他們的政治舞台:法院(司法機構)
The Players & Their Politics: The Courts |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Horn， Van等其他作者，第7章《政治與公共政策》
Horn,Van, et al. Chap. 7 in Politics & Public Policy.
Brown與學校教育會議(譯者補充：此為著名的最高法院黑人平權運動的里程碑)
Brown v Board of Education
聯邦國家公園處，Brown與學校教育會議的網站上，同學只要閱讀"決定"與"政策執行命令"部分
National Park Service, Brown v Board of Education Web Site.
Under the heading The Case read the sections on
"The Decision" and "The Implementation Order".
在Findlaw的網站上找到Plessy v. Ferguson.的最高法院判例
Findlaw Web Site, Plessy v. Ferguson.
同學只要閱讀Plessy v. Ferguson的意見、最高法官Harlan的不同意的意見
Read the opinion in Plessy v. Ferguson and Justice Harlan's
dissent.
Lukas， J. Anthony. 〈法官〉， 《民意的共同處》的第14章. New York: Alfred A. Knopf， 1985， 頁222-251.
Lukas, J. Anthony. "The Judge." Chap. 14 in Common Ground. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1985, 222-251.
Brown vs學校教育會議的判例在波士頓的實施狀況
Implementing Brown in Boston.
建議讀物
Recommended:
Landy & Levin. 第. 2， 3， 4章《新美國政治系統》
Landy & Levin. Chap. 2, 3, and 4 in The New Politics of Public Policy.
http://www.gse.harvard.edu/nv/features/busing09012000_page1.html
http://www.gse.harvard.edu/nv/features/busing09012000_page1.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
繳交第2份報告
Paper #2 due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
政策參與者與他們的政治舞台：利益團體
The Players & Their Politics: Interest Groups |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Horn， Van等其他作者，第3章《政治與公共政策》
Horn, Van, et al. Chap. 3 in Politics & Public Policy.
Adams， Gordon. 〈國防的企業〉， 於Hays， Vallance， & Van Tassel《美國國防政策》1997，頁151-159
Adams, Gordon. "The Business of Defense." In Hays, Vallance, & Van Tassel, American Defense Policy, 1997, 151-159.
建議讀物
Recommended:
Kelso， William. 〈多元主義的三種型態〉，《美國民主理論：多元主義與他的危機》Westport， CT: Greenwood， 1978， 頁12-29.
Kelso, William. "Three Types of Pluralism." In American Democratic Theory: Pluralism and Its Critics. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1978, 12-29.
Dahl， Robert. 《誰來管理人民》New Haven， CT: Yale University Press， 頁1961(譯者補充：經典，建議閱讀)
Dahl, Robert. Who Governs? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1961.
Heymann， Philip P. 第四章 《政府如何陳述整合公眾意見》 Reich編著， 1988.
Heymann, Philip P. Chap. 4 in How Government Expresses Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988.
Robert Reich. 〈民主制度內的政策制定〉，的第六章，Reich編著，1998
Robert Reich. "Policy Making in a Democracy." Chap. 6 in The Power of Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988.
Milton & Rose Friedman. 《自由的選擇》New York: Harcourt Brace， 1980.
Milton & Rose Friedman. Free to Choose. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1980.
Mills， C. Wright.《權利精英》Oxford University Press， 1956
Mills, C. Wright. The Power Elite. Oxford University Press, 1956.
Olson， Mancur. 《公眾行為的邏輯》Cambridge: Harvard University Press， 1965， 1971
Olson, Mancur. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1965, 1971.
Truman， David. 〈利益團體與國家的本質〉，《美國社會公司》 American Society Inc. M. Zeitlin.編著 New York: Markaham Publishing， 1970.
Truman, David. "Interest Groups and the Nature of the State." In American Society Inc. Edited by M. Zeitlin. New York: Markaham Publishing, 1970. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
我們如何知道政策有效與否?
4:How Do We Know What Works? |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
政策參與者與他們的政治舞台:大眾與媒體
The Players & Their Politics: The Public & the Media |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Horn， Van等其他作者，第8章《政治與公共政策》
Horn, Van, et al. Chap. 8 in Politics & Public Policy.
Downs， Anthon. 〈政策議題起伏的生態：政策議題的循環〉，《公共利益》第 28期 (1972): 頁38-50.
Downs, Anthon. "Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue-Attention Cycle." In Public Interest 28 (1972): 38-50.
建議讀物
Recommended:
Linsky， Martin. 〈媒體與公眾的深思熟慮〉， 第9章《公眾意見的力量》Reich編著，1998
Linsky, Martin. "The Media & Public Deliberation." Chap. 9 in The Power of Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988.
Putnam， Robert. 〈導論：政治精英的比較分析研究〉，《政治精英的比較分析研究》 Englewood Cliffs， NJ: Prentice-Hall， 1976， 頁2-19.
Putnam, Robert. "Introduction: The Comparative Study of Political Elites." In The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976, 2-19.
Walker， Jack. 〈 對民主制度下精英理論的批評〉，《美國政治期刊》， 1966.
Walker, Jack. "A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy." In American Political, 1966.
Heifetz， Ronald， 和 Riley Sinder. 〈管理各種公共政策的解決方案〉，《公眾意見的力量》的第八章，Reich編著，1998
Heifetz, Ronald, and Riley Sinder. "Managing the Public's Problem Solving." Chap. 8 In The Power of Public Ideas. Edited by Reich, 1988. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
成本效益分析與風險管理
Cost Benefit Analysis & Risk Assessment |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
美預算管理局的經濟分析
OMB Circular on Economic Analysis.
Piehl， Anne， Bert Useem， 和 John Dilulio， Jr. 〈三個州的獄所管理之成本效益分析〉， 公民創意中心， 1999， 頁1-15.
Piehl, Anne, Bert Useem, and John Dilulio, Jr. "A Cost Benefit Analysis of Imprisonment in Three States." Center for Civic Innovation, 1999, 1-15.
〈能源安全〉， 於《美國公共政策辯論議題》，2002，頁156-
"Energy Security." In Issues for Debate in American Public Policy, 2002, 156-.
建議讀物
Recommended:
Kopp， Raymond J.， Alan J. Krupnick， 和 Michael Toman. 《成本效益分析與政策法規改革》. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future， 1997.
Kopp, Raymond J., Alan J. Krupnick, and Michael Toman. Cost Benefit Analysis and Regulatory Reform. Washington D.C.: Resources for the Future, 1997. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
專案評估
Program Evaluation |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Howell， William， Patrick Wolf， David Campbel，和 Paul Peterson. 〈教育補助券與學術表現：分析三個隨機田野調查案例〉， 《政策分析管理期刊》21， No. 2 (2002): 頁191-217.
Howell, William, Patrick Wolf, David Campbel, and Paul Peterson. "School Vouchers and Academic Performance: Results from Three Randomized Field Trials." In Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21, No. 2 (2002): 191-217. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
專案評估
Program Evaluation |
|
|
指定閱讀
Required:
Howell， William， Patrick Wolf， David Campbel， 和 Paul Peterson. 〈教育補助券與學術表現:分析三個隨機田野調查案例〉，《政策分析管理期刊》21， No. 2 (2002): 頁191-217.
Howell, William, Patrick Wolf, David Campbel, and Paul Peterson. "School Vouchers and Academic Performance: Results from Three Randomized Field Trials." In Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21, No. 2 (2002): 191-217. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
繳交第三份報告
Paper #3 due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
同學口頭報告
Student Presentations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
同學口頭報告
Student Presentations |
|
|
|
