期末考試
(
英文PDF)、
(
英文DOC)
A部分:選擇題
回答正確得一分,錯誤扣半分。不回答不得分也不失分。(總分30分)
- 歷史主義是:
- 依照歷史背景來判斷人們行爲的方法
- 紐倫堡典章的哲理
- 與功利主義一樣
- 認爲歷史高於其它學科的信念
- 功利主義是:
- Michael Walzer關於廣島論點的基礎
- 一種論點,建立在“最高效用是個人權力”的假設上
- 一種論點,建立在“最高效用是最廣泛民衆的最高利益,個人幸福一點也不神聖”的假設上
- 與義務論/道義論相同
- Neils Bohr對原子彈堅持信念。他採取了那些行動?
-
嘗試聯繫羅斯福總統,表達他的觀點
-
設法安排Heisenberg和Oppenheimer會面
-
組織那些參加研製原子彈的科學家做反
-
以上都是
-
以上都不是
- 依照Joseph Rotblat的說法,爲什麽在二戰德國戰敗後,那些參予曼哈頓工程的科學家們沒有選擇離開?
-
對科學的好奇心
-
他們認爲這不是他們的責任
-
這可能影響他們的未來事業
-
以上都是
-
只有1和3是
-
在Michael Walzer的文章中,jus ad bellum 是什麽?
-
一個國家有道德權利向另一個國家投擲原子彈
-
一個國家有道德權利向另一個國家開戰
-
一個國家有道德權利向另一個國家的軍隊和平民作戰
-
一個國家有道德權利追隨和平的道路
-
哪一位科學家亟亟欲試製造氫彈?
-
Joseph Rotblat
-
Leo Szilard
-
Robert Oppenheimer
-
Edward Teller
-
根據Lifton 和Mitchell所言,在Smithsonian展覽Enola Gay飛機的爭議揭示了以下哪一點?(註:Enola Gay是在廣島投下原子彈的美國軍機。)
-
主流媒體在公平描述雙方的論點做得很好
-
代表二戰老兵的組織對不應使用原子彈的說法感到吃驚
-
Smithsonian的館長,被錯誤告知關於廣島和長崎原爆的資料,要人幫忙重新整理展覽的文本
-
廣島和長崎的原爆是必需的,促使日本投降
-
伯克萊大學自然科學學院與誰達成協議?
-
Merck
-
Pfizer
-
Novartis
-
Boots
-
以下哪一位沒有被控告參與人類受試者的不道德研究?
-
Stanley Milgram
-
Laud Humphreys
-
Paul Farmer
-
Phillip Zimbardo
-
John Marks突出了下列哪個議題的重要性?
-
紐倫堡典章定義的知情同意權
-
中央情報局研究人員以戰爭和共産主義的威脅作為任何行動的藉口
-
在保護研究人員免受朋輩審查時,機密所起的作用
-
以上都是
-
基於John Marks的著作,以下那項試驗不是由中央情報局進行?
-
對戰俘和妓女使用LSD
-
催眠
-
使用大麻從“告密者” 套取信息
-
使用壓力倉模擬飛行員對高空飛行的反應
-
以下那一個組合是不對的?
-
John Dower和物理學
-
Paul Farmer和人類學
-
Paul Farmer和醫學
-
Ray Siever和海洋學
-
Marcia Angell的《新英格蘭醫學學報》文章提倡在發展中國家進行以下哪一項?
-
安慰劑受控試驗
-
基於功利計算的治療
-
期望與發達國家一致的治療
-
全民健康保險
-
誰是在「挑戰者號」O環問題上敲警鐘的工程師?
-
Hal Gehman
-
Roger Boisjoly
-
Ron Dittemore
-
Linda Ham
-
以下哪一項是“預防原則” 的例證?
-
限制結果還存在爭論的活動
-
允許結果還存在爭論的活動
-
限制已有清晰結果的活動
-
允許已有清晰結果的活動
-
Rachel Carson的結論對美國環境政策産生了以下哪一項影響?
-
導致禁用一切對人類和環境有害的殺蟲劑
-
導致禁用DDT,因爲它有很高的毒性
-
鼓勵在室內使用DDT,但不鼓勵在戶外使用
-
鼓勵在發展中國家使用DDT,但不鼓勵在美國使用
-
異種器官移植是:
-
使用胚胎幹細胞培育移植用的人類器官
-
從活人捐贈者移植人類器官
-
從腦死亡捐贈者移植人類器官
-
從動物移植器官給人類
- Richard Sclove
-
認爲科學評審能够在歐洲行得通,而在美國則不行,這是由於其不同的文化
-
對非專家就科學决策發揮作用有懷疑
-
認爲科學評審在歐洲能發揮得很好,應在美國多嘗試
-
認爲因為等級文化,科學評審在歐洲失敗;但因為美國有較民主的文化,會發揮得更好
-
Janet Raloff的「科學商店」是:
-
就像「關注公益科學家聯盟」那樣,不能與非政府機構有區別
-
科學家們購買科學儀器的商店
-
為支援在發展中國家做研究尋求企業融資的方法
-
代表有需求的當地社群推動科學研究的安排
-
Jeremy Rifkin對以下那一項沒有提出爭議?
-
生物科技革命將帶來新的基因污染
-
我們應該反對基因材料嘗試取得專利
-
生物科技革命將終結疾病,增加農作物産量,從而使不平等成爲歷史
-
生物科技革命將會消除大自然和文化之間的界限
-
Paul Farmer的主要資助者是
-
Ophelia Dahl
-
Jim Kim
-
Tom White
-
Zanmi Lasante
-
Paul Farmer不相信以下那一項?
-
把稀缺資源集中於對多種藥物抗抗的肺結核是浪費
-
要解决窮人的健康問題,需要政治和醫學干預
-
白人自由主義者表示關心窮人,但少有為後者採取行動;他們是解决方法,也同樣是問題的一部分
-
對HIV呈陽性反應的海地人雖然貧窮和沒有受教育,依然能够遵照複雜的治療程序
-
遺傳决定論(基因決定論),意義是:
-
人類基因組工程最終還是有缺陷
-
基因會說明所有要知道關於一個人的信息
-
自然/培育的爭論依然沒有解决
-
取得基因的專利權是生物研究必要的部分
-
對客席講師James Shirley來說,當考慮幹細胞研究的倫理問題時,胚胎的道德狀况如何?
-
就像考慮墮胎一樣
-
在一些情況下,胚胎幹細胞研究是可以接受的
-
胚胎是人和有生命,應受法律保護
-
因爲胚胎幹細胞研究是發展醫藥治療的至關重要的研究領域,因此沒有關係
-
Leon Kass
-
同意Richard Lewontin的觀點,認爲反對克隆的宗教論點是虛假的
-
希望暫時禁止為生育而植入克隆胚胎
-
希望暫時禁止克隆人類胚胎
-
允許研究克隆胚胎,但支持完全禁止為生育而植入克隆人類胚胎
-
從以下的選擇中,Michael Pollan最關注Monsanto的新葉馬鈴薯是那一項?
-
它們需要大量殺蟲劑噴灑
-
它們在商場出售的時候沒有貼上轉基因標簽
-
它們代表著由企業控制的單一培育作物群體
-
Pollan在日常聚會不能用這來做沙拉
-
Theodora Capaldo博士在客席演講中
-
關注以黑猩猩等高級哺乳動物作實驗,而不關注老鼠
-
支持「人道對待動物委員會」活躍份子衝入實驗室拯救被困動物
-
強調在藥物測試實驗中,動物往往是人類的低劣代替品
-
強調在藥物測試實驗中,動物無可置疑是人類的良好代替品,但以動物試驗仍然是不道德
-
以下那一項不是真的?
-
在抗議iLAb實驗室的前夕,軍事研究佔麻省理工學院的預算50%以上
-
麻省理工學院的教員Norbert Weiner在二戰中研究武器,却在戰後拒絕擔任軍軍工作
-
麻省理工學院在20世紀60年代抗議,成功地把儀器實驗室遷出校園,但未能把它轉爲非軍事研究
-
在麥卡錫主義時代,Phillip Morrison被康奈爾大學開除
-
以下那一項不是真的?
-
一如美國那樣,改良的轉基因食品必須貼上標簽
-
Monsanto的轉基因馬鈴薯被官方登記爲殺蟲劑
-
轉基因玉米的基因已從美國傳到墨西哥的遙遠地方
-
Monsanto故意把農作物加工為不育
-
以下那一個系統容易有正常事故?
-
核反應堆
-
空中交通管制
-
捷運公交系統
-
以上都是
-
(1)和 (2)
-
(1)和 (3)
B部分: 短論文
從下面選四個,每個寫一段。每個答案5分 (最多20分)。
Michael Walzer的滑動比例
Amy Smith
基因術
Nurse Rivers
Philip Morrison
外行充內行
戰車計劃
DDT
C部分:長論文
選擇下面的一個主題,寫一篇論文,儘量多用課程教材。(最多30分。)
-
科學在什麽程度上會由市場規範?
-
Jeremy Rifkin問道:是否有某些科技,其內在力量是如此強大和超越一切,一旦釋放會導致失多於得,弊大於利?如果有這樣的科技,如何能够限制?
Rikfin, Jeremy 《第二個創世紀》 李文昭譯,晨星出版,1999年正體譯本The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World》New York: Penguin, 1999, pp. 231. ISBN: 0874779537.
Final Exam
(英文PDF)、
(英文DOC)
Section A: Multiple Choice
Each correct answer earns you one point. Half a point will be subtracted from your score for each incorrect answer. You will neither gain nor lose points if you give no answer to a question. (Maximum possible score: 30 points.)
- Historicism is
- An approach that judges people's actions according to their historical context
- The philosophy underlying the Nuremberg Code
- The same as utilitarianism
- The belief that history is superior to other academic disciplines
- Utilitarianism is
- The basis of Michael Walzer's argument about Hiroshima
- An argument based on the assumption that the highest utility is the rights of the individual
- An argument based on the assumption that the highest utility is the greatest good of the greatest number and that there is nothing sacrosanct about the happiness of the individual.
- The same as deontology
- Neils Bohr held firm beliefs about the atomic bomb. Which action did he take?
-
Attempted to contact President Roosevelt to communicate his views
-
Tried to organize a meeting between Heisenberg and Oppenheimer
-
Organized a revolt involving scientists who were making the bomb
-
All of the above
-
None of the above
- According to Joseph Rotblat, why did scientists not choose to leave the Manhattan Project once Germany had been defeated in World War II?
-
Scientific curiosity
-
They didn't feel it was their responsibility
-
It might affect their future careers
-
All of the above
-
(1) and (3) only
-
In Michael Walzer's article, what does jus ad bellum refer to?
-
A country has a moral right to drop an atomic bomb on another country
-
A country has a moral right to go to war against another country
-
A country has a moral right to fight against both military personnel and civilians of another country
-
A country has a moral obligation to pursue the path of peace
-
Which scientist was eager to make the hydrogen bomb?
-
Joseph Rotblat
-
Leo Szilard
-
Robert Oppenheimer
-
Edward Teller
-
The Enola Gay controversy at the Smithsonian revealed which of the following, according to Lifton and Mitchell?
-
Mainstream media did a good job of representing both sides of the issue fairly
-
Organizations representing veterans who fought in World War II were appalled by arguments that the atomic bomb should not have been used
-
The Smithsonian curators, misinformed about the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, needed help with their script for the exhibit
-
The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was necessary to bring about the surrender of Japan
-
The College of Natural Resources Department at Berkeley made a deal with
-
Merck
-
Pfizer
-
Novartis
-
Boots
-
Which of the following has NOT been accused of participating in unethical research on human subjects
-
Stanley Milgram
-
Laud Humphreys
-
Paul Farmer
-
Phillip Zimbardo
-
John Marks highlighted the importance of the following issues
-
Informed consent as defined by the Nuremburg Code
-
The use of war and communism as threats that justified any actions by CIA researchers
-
The role of secrecy in protecting researchers from peer scrutiny
-
All of the above
-
Based on John Marks' book, which of the following experiments did the CIA not conduct?
-
Use of LSD on prisoners and prostitutes
-
Hypnosis
-
Use of marijuana to get information from "informers"
-
Use of pressure chambers to model pilot responsiveness to high altitude flying conditions
-
Which of the following pairs is the odd one out?
-
John Dower and physics
-
Paul Farmer and anthropology
-
Paul Farmer and medicine
-
Ray Siever and oceanography
-
In her New England Journal of Medicine article, Marcia Angell advocates which of the following in developing countries?
-
Placebo controlled trials
-
Treatment based on utilitarian calculations
-
Treatment in accordance with what one would expect in a developed country
-
Universal health insurance
-
Who was the engineer who blew the whistle on the Challenger space shuttle's O-ring problem?
-
Hal Gehman
-
Roger Boisjoly
-
Ron Dittemore
-
Linda Ham
-
The "Precautionary Principle" exemplifies which of the following?
-
The restriction of activities the consequences of which are contested
-
The permitting of activities the consequences of which are contested
-
The restriction of activities the consequences of which are clearly established
-
The permitting of activities the consequences of which are clearly established
-
Rachel Carson's conclusions had which of the following effects on environmental policy in the United States?
-
Led to a ban on all pesticides as harmful to humans and the environment
-
Led to the ban of DDT because of its highly toxic nature
-
Encouraged the use of DDT indoors, but discouraged it for outdoor use
-
Encouraged the use of DDT in developing countries, but discouraged its use in the United States
-
Xenotransplantation refers to
-
The use of embryonic stem cells to make human organs for transplantation
-
Transplanting human organs from living donors
-
Transplanting human organs from brain-dead donors
-
Transplanting organs from animals to humans
- Richard Sclove
-
Says science juries work in Europe but would not work in the U.S. because of its different culture
-
Is skeptical that non-experts should play any role in decision-making about science
-
Says science juries have worked well in Europe and should be tried more in the U.S.
-
Says science juries have failed in Europe because of its hierarchical culture, but would work better in the U.S. because of its more democratic culture.
-
Janet Raloff's Science Shops are
-
Indistinguishable from NGOs such as the Union of Concerned Scientists
-
Stores where scientists buy their scientific equipment
-
A way of finding corporate funding to support research in developing countries
-
Arrangements to facilitate scientific research on behalf of local communities in need
-
Which of the following does Jeremy Rifkin NOT argue?
-
The biotech revolution will bring with it new kinds of genetic pollution
-
We should oppose attempts to patent genetic material
-
The biotech revolution will, by ending disease and increasing crop yields, make inequality a problem of the past.
-
The biotech revolution will dissolve the boundary between nature and culture.
-
Paul Farmer's major financier was
-
Ophelia Dahl
-
Jim Kim
-
Tom White
-
Zanmi Lasante
-
Which of the following does Paul Farmer NOT believe?
-
Focusing scarce resources on multi-drug resistant TB is a waste
-
The health problems of the poor require political as well as medical intervention if they are to be cured
-
White liberals ("WLs") profess concern for the poor but rarely take action on their behalf, and so are as much a part of the problem as the solution
-
Despite their poverty and lack of education, HIV+ Haitians can follow complicated treatment regimens
-
Genetic Determinism means
-
The human genome project is ultimately flawed
-
Genes tell you all you need to know about a person
-
The nature/nurture debate has not been resolved
-
Patenting genes is a necessary part of biological research
-
For (guest lecturer) James Shirley, what is the moral status of the embryo when considering the ethics of stem cell research?
-
The same as when considering abortion
-
Embryonic stem cell research is acceptable under some circumstances
-
Embryos merit protection since they are both human and alive
-
It doesn't matter because embryonic stem cell research is a vital area of research for developing medical treatments
-
Leon Kass
-
Agrees with Richard Lewontin that religious arguments against cloning are spurious
-
Wants a temporary moratorium on implanting cloned embryos to make a child
-
Wants a temporary moratorium on the cloning of human embryos
-
Favors a complete ban on implanting cloned human embryos to make a child while allowing research on cloned embryos
-
From qmong the following choices, what was the most important concern surrounding Monsanto's new leaf potatoes for Michael Pollan?
-
They required large amounts of pesticide spray
-
They are not labeled as GM when sold in supermarkets
-
They represented a society of monocultures controlled by corporations
-
Pollan could not use them to make a salad for his potluck party
-
In her guest lecture Dr. Theodora Capaldo
-
Was concerned about experimentation on higher mammals such as chimpanzees, but was not concerned about rats
-
Supported PETA activists who break into labs to liberate animals being kept there
-
Argued that animals are often poor human analogues in drug testing experiments
-
Argued that animals are invariably good human analogues in drug testing experiments, but that it is still immoral to experiment on them
-
Which of the following is NOT true?
-
On the eve of the protests against the I-Lab, military research accounted for more than 50% of MIT's budget
-
Norbert Weiner, an MIT faculty member, worked on weapons in World War II but then refused to do military work after the war
-
The MIT protests of the 1960s succeeded in getting the Instrumentation Lab moved off campus, but not in converting it to non-military research
-
Phillip Morrison was fired by Cornell during the McCarthyist years
-
Which of the following statements is untrue?
-
Genetically modified food must be labeled as such in the U.S.
-
Monsanto's GM potatoes are officially registered as pesticides
-
GM corn genes have already drifted from the U.S. to remote parts of Mexico
-
Monsanto deliberately engineered crops to be sterile
-
Which of the following systems could be prone to a normal accident?
-
Nuclear reactor
-
Air traffic control
-
Metro bus system
-
All of the above
-
(1) and (2)
-
(1) and (3)
Section B: Short Essays
Pick 4 of the following. Write one paragraph on each of your choices. Each answer is worth 5 points (for a maximum of 20 points).
Michael Walzer's sliding scale
Amy Smith
Algeny
Nurse Rivers
Philip Morrison
ACT UP
Project Chariot
DDT
Section C: Long Essay
Pick ONE of the following and write an essay on it, bringing in as much of the course material as possible. (Maximum score 30 points.)
-
To what extent can science be left to the market to regulate?
-
Jeremy Rifkin asks: "Are there technologies whose inherent power is so immense and overshadowing that the unleashing of that power will result in greater diminution than enhancement and more harm than good?" Based on your reading for this class, how would you answer this question? And if there are such technologies, how can they be restrained?
Rikfin, Jeremy. The Biotech Century: Harnessing the Gene and Remaking the World. New York: Penguin, 1999, pp. 231. ISBN: 0874779537.