|
|
 |
|
所有學生必須完成每週的閱讀，並針對內容寫一份2-3頁的讀書心得。同時學生也必須共同領導其中一堂課，並於當天課程中帶領討論。
All students will be responsible for each week's reading and will write a weekly response paper of 2-3 pages. Students will also each co-lead one class, providing questions for discussion on that day.
一份15-20頁的期末報告必須在第11次上課前繳交。關於期末報告，以下期限也需遵守： 期末報告綱要說明，初步參考書目，附註解之參考書目的繳交期限分別為第三，第四及第六次上課。
There will be one final paper (15-20 pp.) which will be due on session 11. As part of writing your final paper, the following due dates will also apply: statement of paper topic, session 3; initial bibliography, session 4; annotated bibliography, session 6.
期末報告寫作方向
Final Paper Guide
1. 來源
Sources
- 這些案件裡，歷史學家是怎樣利用現有史料？
what do historians have extant as sources in this case?
- 那些史料的優缺為何？
what are the strengths and weaknesses of those sources?
- 這些史料的作者為何？
who are the authors of the sources?
- 這些史料是否能代表被告與原告？
do the sources represent both the defense and the prosecution?
- 史料本身隱含的偏見又是怎樣介入史學家對案件的認知？
what biases do the nature of the sources introduce into historians' knowledge of the case?
2. 檢視文獻
Review of the literature
- 史學家如何利用現有資料來源？
how have historians used the sources available to them?
- 他們產生怎樣的爭論？
what arguments have they made?
- 什麼成為他們的注意焦點或參考架構？
what has been their focus or frame of reference?
- 參考架構又如何影響了他們的爭論？
how has the frame of reference affected their arguments?
3. 你對案件的論點：一些可能的研究方向
Your argument about the case: some possible approaches
- 法律，哲學，或道德的議題。
legal, philosophical, or ethical issues
- 證據論點
issues of evidence
- 科學證據。
scientific evidence
- 其他有決定性影響的證據。
other kinds of material evidence
- 人證和證詞。
interpersonal evidence and testimony
- 來龍去脈 -當時發生的特定歷史爭議
context - particular historical issues at work at the time
- 因果關係
causality
- 什麼導致審判？
what gave rise to the trial?
- 什麼導致既定的審判結果？
what gave rise to the given outcome or outcomes?
- 特定人格特質扮演怎樣的角色？
what was the role of particular personalities?
- 時間在審判中扮演怎樣的角色？
what was the role of timing in the trial?
- 戲劇性
drama
- 若把審判視為舞台表演，你會注意它哪一方面的呈現方式？
if you were viewing the trial as a staged event, what would you notice about the ways it was conducted?
- 媒體報導
coverage in the press
- 誰報導了這場審判？哪個作者，哪份期刊？
who is covering this trial? Which authors and which periodicals?
- 他們關注的要點為何？
what are their primary foci?
- 法律議題，政治，道德，人情
legal issues, political, moral, human interest
- 作者用了什麼措辭？
what kinds of language are the authors using?
- 不同的期刊用怎樣的方式表達對審判的不同觀點？
in what ways do different periodicals take different views of the trial?
- 作者對於有罪和無罪的觀念是否一致？
how fixed are the writers in their notions of guilt and innocence?
- 法律議題涵蓋的程度有多廣？
how much are legal issues covered?
- 接受，即人們在審判過後是怎樣看待它的呢？
reception, i.e., how people after the trial have looked at it
- 例如，神聖化或妖魔化主角。
e.g., canonization or demonization of the main figures
4. 幾點提醒：
A caution or two:
- 試著專注於審判本身，盡量避免分心在導致審判的原因。
try to stay focused on the trial itself without getting carried away by the events leading up to it
- 你的報告裡面或許會需要一些關於審判技巧等議題的資料
you may want some kind of background info in your paper on the technical issues of venue, etc.
- 舉證。
citations
|
|
|
|
 |
|
