®Éµ{ªí¦C¥X¤F¹ê½î½Òµ{ªº¨C¶g¶i«×¡CnÁA¸Ñ§ó§¹¾ãªº¹ê½î½Òµ{¶iµ{´yz¡A½Ð°Ñ¬Ý§@·~³¡¤À¡C
The calendar table shows the progress of the studio by week. For a more complete description of the process of the studio, see the assignments section.
Calendar Table
| 2 |
°Q½×¡G¬°¦w¸Ë§@·Ç³Æ Discussion: Preparation for the Installation |
¹ê½î½Òµ{©M¦w¸Ëªº¼ç¦b²z©À³£¨Ó¦Û¤_¾Ç¥ÍªºÓ¤H¸g¾ú©M±¡·P¡A¦Ó¥B³o¨Ç·|¦b°Q½×©M»s§@¹Lµ{³Qµo²{¡C¹ê½î½Òµ{·|¦b³Â¬Ù²z¤u¾Ç°|§°ó³sÄòªá¥|¤p®É¨ÓÅéÅç®É¶¡¬y³u¤¤ªºªÅ¶¡¡þ§÷®Æ¡þ§Î¦¡¡þµ²ºc¡C The ideas behind the studio and installations all came from the personal histories and emotions of the students, and were discovered through a process of discussion and making. The studio spent four hours consecutively in the MIT Chapel, to experience space / material / form / structure over time. |
| 3 |
¦w¸Ë Installation |
¾Ç¥ÍªuµÛ³Â¬Ù²z¤u¾Ç°|¨«´Y«öì©l¤j¤p¶i¦æ¦w¸Ë¡C¦b¦w¸Ë¤¤¦Ò¼{¨ìªÅ¶¡ªº§G§½¡B©~¦í©M¦û¦³¡A³o¨Ç³£»P®É¶¡©M¦ñÀH³W¼Ò§ïÅܦӵo¥Íªº§ïÅܬÛÃö¡C The students built their installations at full scale along the corridors of MIT. Topology, inhabitation, and the occupation of space were all considered in the installation, all relative to time and the changes that occur along that scale. |
| 5 |
¦w¸Ë¦^ÅU Installation Review |
|
| 6 |
°Q½×¡G°ÝÃD Discussion: Issues |
¹ê½î½Òµ{¥H¤U¦C°ÝÃD§@¬°±´¯Á«Ø¿vª«ªº¤èªk¡G»s§@ªº´`Àô©Ê½è¡þ«¤O¡A²{¶H¾Ç¡A¹ê½è©Ê¡þ·Pª¾¡þªÀ·|¥Í¬¡©M¾Ç¥Í¤å¤Æ¡þªÅ¶¡ùتº³Ð·s©M¥Í¬¡¦A³y¡C The studio took on the following issues as a method of discovering architecture: The cyclical nature of making / gravity, phenomenology, materiality / perception / social life and the culture of students / renovation and recreation of life in space. |
| 7 |
·§©À¼Ò«¬ Conceptual Models |
°Q½×:¥H¦w¸Ë°ÝÃD¬°¤¤¤ßªº¼Ò«¬¡A¥H¤Î»P¾Ç¥Í¤¤¤ß±M®×¦³Ãöªº¼Ò«¬¡C Models centered around the issues raised in the installations, and related to the program of the student center, were discussed. |
| 8 |
§÷®Æ¼Ò«¬¦^ÅU Material Model Review |
³Ð³y¨Ã°Q½×¯à°÷´yz§÷®Æ¥»½è»PÃö«Yªº¼Ò«¬¡C Models depicting the nature and relation of materials were created and discussed. |
| 10 |
´Á¤¤´_²ß Midterm Review |
|
| 11 |
°Q½×¡G¦aÂI Discussion: Site |
¦¹®É¡Apµe¤w§ó¥[²M´·©úÁA¡A¤]§ä¨ì¤F¶µ¥Øªº¦aÂI¡C²{¦b°ÝÃDÅܱo§ó¥[¹ê»Ú¡G¾÷±ñ©Mºc³y¾Ç¡þ¯S©Ê©M¦aÂI¡þ¾Ç¥Í¦û¾Ú¯S©wªÅ¶¡¡þ±q¤@¯ë¤¤§ä¥X¯SÂI At this point, the program has become clearer, and the site for the project is discovered. The issues now become more real: Mechanism and tectonics / nature and site / student occupation of specific spaces / making the specific from the generic. |
| 13 |
¤º®e¦^ÅU Content Review |
¦bÀJ¹¢³Ì«á³]p¤§»Ú¡A¦^ÅU¨ä²Ó¸`¡C As the final design became more refined, its details were reviewed. |
| 15 |
³Ì«á¦^ÅU Final Review |
|