|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
課程介紹, 系統安全 , 和危險確認
Introduction to class, system safety, and hazard identification (PDF) |
|
|
|
• 《安全概念》 第1，2，7，8和9章
Safeware. Ch. 1, 2, 7, 8 and 9.
本人新書 第1，4章
• New. Ch. 1 and 4.
http://sunnyday.mit.edu/book2.pdf
• MIL-STD-882B (PDF)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
對危險責任， PHA與危險評估，以及意外事件起因進行問題討論及課堂辯論
Discussion questions and in-class debate on responsibility for risk, PHA and risk assessment, causes of accidents (PDF) |
|
|
|
•《安全概念》第3，4和5章
Safeware. Ch. 3, 4 and 5.
航太意外事件記錄
• Aerospace Accidents paper (PDF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
評論意外事件起因的相關作業，意外事件模型，評論關於馬塔角冒險飛車的初步危險分析，意圖詳述
Review causes of accidents assignment, accident models, review preliminary hazard analysis for Matterhorn, intent specifications (PDF) |
|
|
|
• 《安全概念》第10章
Safeware. Ch. 10.
本人新書 第2，3，5，6和7章
• New. Ch. 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7.
http://sunnyday.mit.edu/book2.pdf
• Rasmussen (PDF)
• 意圖詳述討論
Intent Specifications paper (PDF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
Jeff Joyce來訪，冒險分析，問題根源分析
Jeff Joyce visit, hazard analysis, root cause analysis (PDF) |
|
|
|
•《安全概念》第13和14章
Safeware. Ch. 13 and 14.
•Jeff Joyce
• Jeff Joyce paper (PDF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
狀態機， SpecTRM-RL，需求和需求分析
State machines, SpecTRM-RL, requirements and requirements analysis (PDF) |
|
|
|
• 《安全概念》第15章
Safeware. Ch. 15. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
評論馬塔角冒險飛車第一層，Dan Gregory(Raytheon的系統安全工程師)
Review Matterhorn Level 1, Dan Gregory (system safety engineer from Raytheon) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
第一階段學期專案設計交稿
Term Project Level 1 due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
安全設計
Design for safety (PDF) |
|
|
|
• 《安全概念》第16章
Safeware. Ch. 16.
• Knight and Leveson
•我們評論的回復
A Reply to Our Critics (PDF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
人類與自動操作
Humans and Automation (PDF) |
|
|
|
•《安全概念》第6和17章
Safeware. Ch. 6 and 17.
• Bachelder 與 Leveson
Bachelder and Leveson (PDF) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
Francis來訪，意外事件調查, STAMP分析的陳述和Titan衛星分析的作業(Karen Marais)
Francis visit, accident investigation, presentation of STAMP analyses and assignment on Titan analysis, (Karen Marais) |
|
|
|
•能源部標準
DOE standard
•NASA標準
NASA standard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
來自Electric Boat（潛水艇）的訪問者，複習第二階段專案設計
Visitors from Electric Boat (submarines), review level 2 of project |
|
|
|
抓緊時間
Time to catch up |
|
|
|
研究報告第一版交稿
Research Proposal first version due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
操作，根源分析，John Carroll
Operations, root cause analysis, John Carroll |
|
|
|
• Carroll, John S. 〈高危險行業的組織學習活動：自我分析下的邏輯〉，《管理研究期刊》，印刷版
Carroll, John S. "Organizational Learning Activities in High-Hazard Industries: The Logics Underlying Self-Analysis." Journal of Management Studies, in press.
•Carroll, John S., Jenny W. Rudolph, Sachi Hatenaka 〈在高危險組織中從經驗中學習〉，發表於《組織行為研究》
Carroll, John S., Jenny W. Rudolph, Sachi Hatenaka. "Learning from Experience in High-Hazard Organizations." Submitted to Research in Organizational Behavior. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
確認，管理，研究報告答辯
Verification, management, presentation of research proposals |
|
|
|
• 《安全概念》第11，12和18章
Safeware. Ch. 11, 12 and 18. |
|
|
|
研究報告答辯
Research Propoals oral presentation due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
馬塔角冒險飛車設計的評論，綜合報告
Review of Matterhorn designs, Wrap-Up |
|
|
|
•《安全概念》尾聲, pp. 509-511.
Safeware: Epilogue, pp. 509-511.
•SpecTRM方法論
SpecTRM methodology (PDF) |
|
|
|
研究報告最終版和學期專案設計交稿
Research Proposal final version and completed Term Project due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
