| 1 |
½Òµ{16.100²¤¶Introduction to 16.100 |
¤½¥¬§@·~¡1Homework #1 Out |
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò1:Project Lab 1:
¤É¤O©Mªý¤O¦ôºâLift and Drag Estimation
ªý¤O¤ÀÃþ¡Gªí±¼¯À¿ªý¤O¡BÀ£®tªý¤O¡B¿Eªiªý¤O©M»¤¾Éªý¤ODrag Breakdown: Skin Friction, Pressure, Wave, and Induced Drag
¨Ò¤l¡G¨µ¯èª¬ºA¤UªºU2°»¹î¾÷ªº¤É¤O¡Bªý¤O¦ôpExample: L/D Estimation for U2 Spy-plane in Cruise |
|
| 2 |
Ál«¬¤É¤Oªº²£¥Í¡A«ÂI¬O°Ê¶q¦u«í©M¬y°ÊÂà¦VLift Generation on an Airfoil Focusing on Conservation of Momentum and Flow Turning
½Ò°ó¥Ü½d¤ô¬y¼²À»¨ì¤c¤l«áªº¬y°ÊÂà¦VIn-class Demo of Flow Turning with Water Stream Impinging on a Spoon
·§©À©Êªº°ÝÃD¡G¤c¤l¤Wªº¬y°ÊÂà¦V©M·¬}¤¤Ál«¬Â¶¬yConcept Questions: Flow Turning on Spoon and for an Airfoil in a Wind Tunnel |
|
| 3 |
³Ì«áªº¤É¤O·§©À°ÝÃD¡G·¬}¹ïÁl«¬ªº¤Ï§@¥Î¤O(»´«¬·¬})Last Lift Concept Question: Reaction of Tunnel to Airfoil (Lightweight Tunnel)
¶}©l°Q½×¹B°Ê¾Ç¡A¥H±Û«×¬°«ÂIBegin Discussion of Kinematics Focusing on Rotationality
·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡G®Ú¾Ú¬y½u½T©w±Û«×Concept Question: Determining Rotationality from Streamlines |
¥æ§@·~¡1Homework #1 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡2Homework #2 Out
|
| 4 |
¬yÅé·L¹Îªº¹B°Ê¾Ç¡G¹ï¬y¡BÅܧβv¡B´õ¶q©M±Û«×¡B´²«×¡B°ò¥»¾É¼Æ
Kinematics of a Fluid Element: Convection, Strain Rates, Vorticity and Rotationality, Divergence, Substantial Derivative
¨Ò¤l¡GµL±Û©MµL§ÎÅÜÁ³±Û¬y¡A¤Î¨ä©M¹ê»Ú¦ÛµM´õ¬yªºÃö«YExample: Irrotational and Zero Strain Swirling Flows, Relationship to Physical Vortices |
|
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò2:Project Lab 2:
±MÃD·§zOverview of Project
°Q½×´Á¤¤³ø§iªºn¨DDiscuss Current Requirements for Interim Report
¤À²ÕDistribute Team Assignments
¦¬¶°¹ï·¬}´ú¸Õ®É¶¡ªº¦w±ÆCollect Wind Tunnel Testing Times |
|
| 5 |
µ²§ô§ÎÅÜ¡B´²«×©M±Û«×ªº°Q½×Finish Discussion of Strain, Divergence, and Rotationality
·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡G¤£¥iÀ£¬yªº¬yÅé·L¹Îªº¹B°ÊConcept Question: Incompressible Fluid Element Motion
¶}©l°Q½×¤û¹yªºÀ³¤O¡ÐÀ³ÅÜÃö«Y,¥]¬A¼Ð°OºD¨Ò©M¹ïºÙÀ³¤O(£nxy = £nyx)Begin Discussion of Newtonian Stress-strain Relationship including Sign Convention and Need for Symmetric Stresses (tau_xy = tau_yx)
·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡GºÞ¹D¤¤¬yÅé²bÖߩʤOªº¥¿½T¹Bºâ¦¡Concept Question on Correct Expression for Net Viscous Forces on the Fluid in a Channel |
|
| 6 |
µ²§ôÀ³¤O¡ÐÀ³ÅÜÃö«Y¦¡ªº°Q½×Finish Discussion of Stress-strain Relationship |
¥æ§@·~¡2Homework #2 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡3Homework #3 Out
|
| 7 |
°Q½×Stokes°²³]©M°Ê¶q¶Ç¿éªº¤À¤l°Ê¤O¾Çì²z
Discussion of Stokes Hypothesis and Molecular Source of Momentum Transport
ÂX´²¹CÀ¸Play Diffusion Game |
|
|
±MÃD¥æ¬yµªºÃ·|3¡GProject Lab 3:
¤¶²Ð´õ®æªk¨Ã¥Ü½dAVL¡]´õ®æªkÀ³¥Î¡^Introduce Vortex Lattice Methods and Begin Demonstration of AVL |
|
| 8 |
°Q½×¿n¤À©M·L¤À§Î¦¡ªº¥iÀ£¬yªºNavier-Stokes¤èµ{¦¡ Discussion of Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations in Integral and Differential Form
·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡G¬yÅé·L¹Îªº¥[³t«×¶q¯Å¡B²bÀ£¤O©M²bÖߩʤOªº¥¿ÅConcept Questions: Magnitude of Acceleration vs Net Pressure Force vs Net Viscous Force on a Fluid Element |
|
| 9 |
ªiµ¤½¥qBob LiebeckªºÁ¿®y¡G¡uÁl¨¿Ä¦X³]pªº¬D¾Ô¡vGuest Lecture by Bob Liebeck, Boeing Company/MIT, on "BWB Design Challenges" |
¥æ§@·~¡3Homework #3 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡4Homework #4 Out
|
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò4:Project Lab 4:
µ²§ôAVLªº¥Ü½dFinish Demonstration of AVL
³Ì«á¤@Ó¤p®É¶i¦æ¤p²Õ¤u§@·|ijGroup Work Session During Last Hour |
|
| 10 |
¥Î¨âÓ±ÛÂà¶êµ©¶¡¬yÅé¬y°Êªº¯S¨Ò¡A°Q½×¤£¥iÀ£ÖߩʬyÅ骺¸ÑDiscussion of Incompressible Viscous Flow Solutions Giving Specific Example of Between Two Rotating Cylinders
Á¿¸Ñ±±¨î¤èµ{¦¡²Õªº¼h¦¸Åé¨tPresentation of Hierarchy of Governing Equations |
|
| 11 |
¨âÓºtÁ¿¡GTwo Lectures Scheduled Today:
¤£¥iÀ£¶Õ¬yªº°ò¥»°²³]©M·§©À¡GµL±Û¡B½è¶q¦u«í¡B½è¶q¦u«í¤èµ{¦¡ªº½u©Ê¤Î³t«×ªº½u©Ê¡Ad¡¦Alemberts®¯½×¡AKutta Joukowsky©w²z¡A¥H¤ÎKutta±ø¥óDiscussion of Basic Assumptions and Concepts in Incompressible Potential Flow: Irrotationality, Conservation of Mass, Linearity with Respect to Velocity and Conservation of Mass, d'Alemberts Paradox, Kutta Joukowsky Theorem, and the Kutta Condition
´XÓ·§©À°ÝÃD¡G¶Õ¬yªºµL±Û»P½è¶q¦u«í¡A³t«×ªº½u©ÊÅ|¥[»P©MÀRÀ£¡A¶ê¬WÅé©MÁl«¬Â¶¬yªºd¡¦Alembert®¯½×¡AKutta Joukowsky©w²z»PKutta±ø¥óConcept Questions: Irrotationality versus Conservation of Mass for a Potential Flow, Linearity of Velocity versus Static Pressure, d'Alembert's Paradox for Cylinder and Airfoil, Kutta-Joukowsky vs Kutta Condition |
¥æ§@·~¡4Homework #4 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡5Homework #5 Out
|
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò5:Project Lab 5:
¤p²Õ¤u§@·|ijGroup Work Session |
|
| 12 |
¥»´Á¨S¦³Á¿½Ò¦]¬°¤W´Á¤w¸g¦³¨â¦¸Á¿½ÒNo lecture today since two lectures were held on Lec #11 |
|
| 13 |
°Q½×´õ±ªkDiscussion of Vortex Panel Method |
|
| 14 |
Á¡Ál²z½×¤¶²ÐIntroduction to Thin Airfoil Theory |
¥æ§@·~¡5Homework #5 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡6Homework #6 Out |
|
±MÃD¥æ¬yµªºÃ·|6¡GProject Lab 6:
CFD¡]pºâ¬yÅé°Ê¤O¾Ç¡^ªº¤¶²ÐIntroduction to CFD
Fluent³nÅé¨Ï¥ÎªºÂ²µu¥Ü½dShort Demo on the Use of Fluent |
|
| 15 |
Á¡Ál²z½×¦b«e½t©M«á½tÃÌÁl¤WªºÀ³¥ÎApplication of Thin Airfoil Theory to Leading-edge and Trailing-edge Flaps
¨Ï¥Î«e½t©M«á½tÃÌÁlªº¥ØªºPurpose of Leading-edge and Trailing-edge Flaps
«e½t§l¤O®pȤΨä»PÁ¡Ál«¬©Mªï¨¤ªºÃö«YLeading-edge Suction Peak and Relation to Thin Airfoils and Incidence |
|
| 16 |
Á¡Ál²z½×¦b´£°ªÀRºAéw©Ê¤è±ªºÀ³¥ÎApplication of Thin Airfoil Theory to Improving Static Stability
«á½t¤Ï§éReflex Trailing Edges |
|
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò7¡GProject Lab 7:
¤p²Õ¤u§@·|ijGroup Work Session |
|
| 17 |
µ²§ô¦³ÃöÀRºAéw©Ê©M«á½t¤Ï§éªºÁl«¬³]pªº°Q½×Finish Discussion of Designing Airfoils for Static Stability and Reflexed Trailing Edges
¤É¤O½uªº¤¶²ÐIntroduction to Lifting Line
·§©À©Êªº°ÝÃD¡G¤É¤O¡A¤É¤O¤À§G©M»¤¾Éªý¤O¤§¶¡ªºÃö«YConcept Questions: Relationship Between Lift, Lift Distribution, and Induced Drag |
¥æ§@·~¡6Homework #6 Due |
| 18 |
¤É¤O½u¤èªk±o¥Xªºµ²ªGªº°Q½×Discussion of Lifting Line Results
®i©¶¤ñ¹ï»¤¾Éªý¤O©M¤É¤Oªº¼vÅTImpact of Aspect Ratio on Induced Drag and Lift
´X¦ó§Îª¬¹ïÁl®i®ÄÀ³ªº¼vÅTImpact of Geometry on Span Efficiency
»¤¾Éªý¤OªºTrefftz¥±¤ÀªRTrefftz Plane Analysis of Induced Drag |
|
| 19 |
µ²§ôÃö©ó¤É¤O½u¤èªkªº°Q½×Finish Discussion of Lifting Line
¾÷Ál§áÂ઺¼vÅTImpact of Twist
¤£¨Ï¥Î¾ò¶ê¥±§Îª¬ªº¾÷Ál¦p¦ó±o¨ì¾ò¶ê§Îªº¤É¤O¤À§GAchieving Elliptic Lift Distribution without Elliptic Planform |
|
|
±MÃD¥æ¬yµªºÃ·|8¡GProject Lab 8:
¤p²Õ¤u§@®É¶¡Group Work Time |
|
| 20 |
¹ï¤É¤O½u²z½×ªº¥Dnµ²½×°µ¤@ÓÁ`µ²Summarize Lifting Line Main Conclusions
¶}©l°Q½×·¬}¸ÕÅç©M¬y°Ê¬Û¦ü©ÊBegin Discussion of Wind Tunnel Testing and Flow Similarity |
¤½¥¬§@·~¡7Homework #7 Out |
| 21 |
µ²§ô¬y°Ê¬Û¦ü©Ê¤Î¨ä¦b·¬}¸ÕÅ礤À³¥Îªº°Q½×Finish Discussion of Flow Similarity and Application to Wind Tunnel Testing
¶}©l°Q½×·¬}¬}¾À¤zÂZ®ÄÀ³Begin Discussion of Wind Tunnel Wall Effects |
|
| 22 |
µ²§ôÃö©ó¦a±®ÄÀ³©M·¬}¬}¾À¤zÂZ®ÄÀ³ªºÃè¹³¤ÀªRªº°Q½×Finish Discussion of Image Analysis for Ground Effect and Tunnel Wall Effects
¶}©l°Q½×¤f¸Õªºµ²ªGBegin Discussion of Results from Oral Exam |
¥æ§@·~¡7Homework #7 Due |
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò9¡GProject Lab 9:
¤p²Õ¤u§@®É¶¡Group Work Time |
|
| 23 |
°Q½×¹B¥Îªk¦V°Ê¶q¤èµ{¦¡±o¨ìªºÅs«×©M«p«×¹ïÁl«¬À£¤O¤À§Gªº¼vÅT(§Ydp/dr = rho V^2/R)
Discussion of the Effect of Camber and Thickness on Pressure Distribution Over an Airfoil Using Normal Momentum Equation (i.e. dp/dr = rho V^2/R) |
¤½¥¬§@·~¡8Homework #8 Out |
| 24 |
±q´XÓ·§©À©Êªº°ÝÃD¶}©l°Q½×Ãä¬É¼hªº·§©À¡C°ÝÃD¥]¬AÃä¬É¼h¤ºªºÀ£¤O¯S¼x¡BÃä¬É¼hªº¦s¦b¹ï¾ãÅéÀ£¤Oªº¼vÅT¡B¼h¬yÁl«¬¤W¼¯À¿¤OÀH©¶¦V¶ZÂ÷ªºÅܤơCBegin discussion of boundary layer concept using several concept questions on the behavior of pressure through boundary layer, the effect of the boundary layer on the pressure, and the behavior of the skin friction vs chord-wise distance on a laminar airfoil |
¥æ±MÃD³ø§iProject Report Due |
| 25 |
¤¶²ÐÃä¬É¼hªº¶q¯Å¹ï¤ñ¤ÀªRªkIntroduction of order of magnitude scaling analysis for boundary layers
¥Î¦¹ªk±À¾É¥XÃä¬É¼h¤èµ{¦¡²ÕDerivation of boundary layer equations using scaling analysis |
|
| 26 |
¤¶²ÐÃä¬É¼hªº±±¨îÅé¤èªk¡A¥Î©ó°Q½×¦³Ãöªº°ò¥»ªº¾÷²z¡A¤×¨ä¬O¾À±¼¯À¿©MÀ£¤O±è«×¾ÉPªº°Ê¶qÅܤÆIntroduction of control volume analysis of a boundary layer to discuss basic mechanisms involved: specifically, wall friction and pressure gradients resulting in momentum changes
°Q½×¬y°Ê¤ÏÂà¡B¤ÀÂ÷©Ò»Ýªº°fÀ£±è«×Discussion of need for adverse pressure gradient for flow reversal/separation to occur |
¤½¥¬§@·~¡9Homework #9 Out
¥æ§@·~¡8Homework #8 Due |
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò10¡GProject Lab 10:
¤p²Õ¤u§@®É¶¡Group Work Time |
|
| 27 |
¤¶²Ð¿n¤À§Î¦¡ªºÃä¬É¼h°Ñ¼Æ©M¤èµ{¦¡²Õ¡A¥]¬A¦ì²¾©M°Ê¶q«p«×Introduction of integral boundary layer parameters and equations including displacement and momentum thickness
¥Ü½d¥Ñ©óÃä¬É¼h«p«×·½°_ªºÀ£®tªý¤ODemonstration of pressure drag source due to boundary layer thickness |
|
| 28 |
ªí±¼¯À¿©M¼¯À¿ªý¤O»P¹p¿Õ¼Æ¤§¶¡Ãö«YBasic behavior of skin friction and friction drag with respect to Reynolds number
·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡G¦Û¥Ñ¬y³t«×ÅܤƩM¬y¦V¤è¦ì¡]¦p©¶ªø¡^ªºÅܤƤް_ªºªý¤OÅܤÆConcept question: behavior of drag due to changes in freestream velocity and streamwise orientation (i.e. chord length) |
¥æ§@·~¡9Homework #9 Due |
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò11Project Lab 11 |
|
| 29 |
¥Î¹êÅç©Î¥é¯u±o¨ìªºµøÄ±¤Æ¬y°Ê¡A°Q½×¯¿¬yªº¦æ¬°Discussion of the behavior of turbulent flows using flow visualizations from experiments and simulations
¥Ü½d¼h¬y¡B¼h¬y¤£Ã©w¡BÂà´«¡B¯¿¬yªº®t§O¡A¯S§O±j½Õ¼h¬y¡]¤p¤Ø«×¡^²V¦X©M¯¿¬y¡]¤j¤Ø«×¡^²V¦Xªº¹ï¤ñDemonstration of the difference between laminar, laminar unsteady, transitional, and turbulent flow stressing laminar (i.e. microscopic) mixing versus turbulent (i.e. macroscopic) mixing |
|
| 30 |
°Q½×ÀHµÛ¹p¿Õ¼Æªº¼W¥[¡AÁl«¬¤WªºÃä¬É¼hªºÅܤÆDiscussion of the behavior of the boundary layer on airfoils as Reynolds number increases
¼h¬y¡BÂà´«©M¯¿¬y¡GÂà´«¤¤ªí±¼¯À¿ªº¦æ¬°ÅܤÆLaminar, transition, and turbulent flows: behavior of skin friction in transition
¨Ï¥Îe^N¤èªk±o¨ìªºÂà´«¼Ò«¬¡]¶È©ó½u©Ê¤£Ã©wÃä¬É¼h©M¾ÉPÂà´«ªºÂZ°Ê©ñ¤jªº°ò¥»«ä·Q¡^Transition modeling through e^N method (only basic idea of linearly unstable boundary layers and amplification of disturbances leading to transition) |
|
| 31 |
¥Î±±¨îÅéªk©Mµ¥æi²¤Æ¡A±À¾É¥X¥iÀ£¤@ºûºÞ¹D¬y°Êªº¤èµ{¦¡Derivation of compressible 1-D channel flow equations using a control volume analysis and reduction to isentropic form of equations |
¤½¥¬§@·~¡10Homework #10 Out |
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò12Project Lab 12 |
|
| 32 |
¨Ï¥Îã¤@ºû¼Ú©Ô¸Ñ¥Ü½d¦b¤@Ó¦¬ÁY¡ÐÂX±i¼Q¼L¤¤¡A¥Ñ©ó¤U´åªºÀ£¤O°§C¦Ó¤Þ°_ªº¿EªiªºÅܤƹLµ{Demonstration of the evolution of a shock wave as the downstream pressure is lowered for a converging-diverging nozzle using a quasi-1D Euler solver
°Q½×³oÓ¹Lµ{¤¤¤£¦Pªº¬y°Ê¦æ¬°¡Gµ¥æi¨Èµ³t¬y¡B¼Q¼L¤¤¦³¿Eªiªº¸óµ³t¬y¡B¦b¥X¤f¦³¿Eªiªº¸óµ³t¬y¡Bµ¥æi¨Èµ³t¬y¨ì±a¿Eªi©Î¼Q¼L¥~¦³¿±µÈªiªº¶Wµ³t¬yDiscussion of different behaviors of this flow: isentropic subsonic, transonic with shock inside nozzle, transonic with shock at exit plane, isentropic subsonic-to-supersonic with shocks or expansion fans outside of nozzle |
|
| 33 |
¤@ºû¥iÀ£¬y¤¤ªºªi°Ê¤¶²Ð¡]Ánªi©Mæiªi¡^Introduction to waves in 1-D compressible flow (acoustic and entropy waves)
±À¾É«D½u©Êªº¿Eªi¸õÂàÃö«YDerivation of nonlinear shock jump relationships
¬ï¹L¿Eªi®É¦UºØ¬y°ÊÄݩʪºÅܤơA¥]¬A°¨»®¼Æ¡BÀ£¤O¡BÁ`À£¤O¡BÖU¡BæiBehavior of properties (Mach number, pressure, total pressure, enthalpy, entropy) across a shock |
¥æ§@·~¡10Homework #10 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡11Homework #11 Out
|
| 34 |
¥Î½u©Ê¤Æ¡]§Y¤£p¤G¶¥¤p¶q¡^±±¨îÅéªk¡A®Ú¾Ú½è¶q¦u«í±À¾É¥Xµ³t¤j¤p¡CDerivation of speed of sound using linearized control volume analysis
§â¾Ç¥Í̤À¬°´XÓ¤p²Õ¡A¿W¥ß§¹¦¨±À¾É¡CManipulation of the conservation of mass, with students placed into teams to complete the derivation themselves
Ãö©óµ¥æi±ø¥ó©M³Ì²×µ²ªGªºÁ¿®yPresentation of isentropic condition and final results |
|
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò13Project Lab 13 |
|
| 35 |
ªi¦b¥±¥iÀ£¬y°Ê¤¤ªº¶Ç¼½¡G¨Èµ³t©M¶Wµ³tªº¤ñ¸ûBehavior of waves in two-dimensional compressible flows: subsonic vs. supersonic
°¨»®¨¤Mach angle |
¥æ§@·~¡11Homework #11 Due |
| 36 |
¨Èµ³t¥iÀ£¬ySubsonic compressible flow
Prandtl-Glauert ÅÜ´«²v¡A¤Î¨Èµ³t¬y¤¤À£¤O«Y¼Æ¡B¤É¤O«Y¼Æ©Mªý¤O«Y¼ÆªºÅܤÆPrandtl-Glauert scaling and behavior of pressure coefficient, lift coefficient, and drag coefficient in subsonic flow
°Q½×¨Èµ³t«DÖߩʬyªºd¡¦Alembert®¯½×¡]±N·|¨Ï¥Î¨ìÃö©ó³o¨Ç¸ÜÃDªº¤£¦Pªº·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡^Discussion of d'Alembert's paradox for subsonic inviscid flows (various concept questions on these topics will be used) |
|
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò14Project Lab 14 |
|
| 37 |
°Q½×¶Wµ³t½u©Ê¤Æ¶Õ¬yDiscussion of supersonic linearized potential flow
°Q½×§@·~¤¤ªº±×±°ÝÃD¡F¶Wµ³t½u©Ê¶Õ¬y¦bÁl«¬¤É¤O©Mªý¤O¤WªºÀ³¥ÎDiscussion on ramp problem given in homework; application to airfoil lift and drag |
|
| 38 |
µ²§ô¦b½u©Ê¶Wµ³t¬y¤¤ªºÁl«¬¤É¤O©Mªý¤Oªº°Q½×Finish discussion of airfoil lift and drag in linearized supersonic flow
¥Ü½d¤É¤O¥u¨Ì¿àªï¨¤¡]¤£¨Ì¿àÅs«×¡^Demonstration of dependence of lift only on angle of attack (not on camber)
Á{¬É°¨»®¼ÆCritical Mach number
¸óµ³t¤Uªºªý¤Oµo´²Drag divergence at transonic conditions
¦b¸óµ³t®Éªº¼¯À¿ªý¤O¡B¿Eªiªý¤O©MÀ£®tªý¤Oªº¤ñ¨Ò²Ó¤ÀBreakdown of friction, wave, and pressure drag through transonic speeds |
|
| 39 |
°Q½×«á±°²z½×©MÁ{¬É°¨»®¼Æªº©µ¿ðDiscussion of sweep theory and delay of the critical Mach number
´Á¥½¦Ò¸Õªº·Ç³ÆComments on preparing for final exam |
|
|
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò15Project Lab 15 |
|