MIT OpenCourseWare


» ¶i¶¥·j´M
 ½Òµ{­º­¶
 ±Ð¾Ç¤jºõ
 ±Ð¾Ç®Éµ{
 §@·~
 ´úÅç
 ±MÃD
 ¬ã²ß¸ê®Æ
 ¬ÛÃö¸ê·½

±Ð¾Ç®Éµ{


¥»­¶Â½Ä¶¶i«×

¿O¸¹»¡©ú

¼f©w¡GµL
½Ķ¡GYu YongJun(²¤¶¨Ã±H«H)
½s¿è¡G¦¶¾ÇùÚ(²¤¶¨Ã±H«H)


½Ò ½Òµ{³æ¤¸ ­«­n¤é´Á
1 ½Òµ{16.100²¤¶
Introduction to 16.100
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­1
Homework #1 Out
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò1:
Project Lab 1:
¤É¤O©Mªý¤O¦ôºâ
Lift and Drag Estimation
ªý¤O¤ÀÃþ¡Gªí­±¼¯À¿ªý¤O¡BÀ£®tªý¤O¡B¿Eªiªý¤O©M»¤¾Éªý¤O
Drag Breakdown: Skin Friction, Pressure, Wave, and Induced Drag
¨Ò¤l¡G¨µ¯èª¬ºA¤UªºU2°»¹î¾÷ªº¤É¤O¡Bªý¤O¦ô­p
Example: L/D Estimation for U2 Spy-plane in Cruise
2 Ál«¬¤É¤Oªº²£¥Í¡A­«ÂI¬O°Ê¶q¦u«í©M¬y°ÊÂà¦V
Lift Generation on an Airfoil Focusing on Conservation of Momentum and Flow Turning
½Ò°ó¥Ü½d¤ô¬y¼²À»¨ì¤c¤l«áªº¬y°ÊÂà¦V
In-class Demo of Flow Turning with Water Stream Impinging on a Spoon
·§©À©Êªº°ÝÃD¡G¤c¤l¤Wªº¬y°ÊÂà¦V©M­·¬}¤¤Ál«¬Â¶¬y
Concept Questions: Flow Turning on Spoon and for an Airfoil in a Wind Tunnel
3 ³Ì«áªº¤É¤O·§©À°ÝÃD¡G­·¬}¹ïÁl«¬ªº¤Ï§@¥Î¤O(»´«¬­·¬})
Last Lift Concept Question: Reaction of Tunnel to Airfoil (Lightweight Tunnel)
¶}©l°Q½×¹B°Ê¾Ç¡A¥H±Û«×¬°­«ÂI
Begin Discussion of Kinematics Focusing on Rotationality
·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡G®Ú¾Ú¬y½u½T©w±Û«×
Concept Question: Determining Rotationality from Streamlines
¥æ§@·~¡­1
Homework #1 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­2
Homework #2 Out
4 ¬yÅé·L¹Îªº¹B°Ê¾Ç¡G¹ï¬y¡BÅܧβv¡B´õ¶q©M±Û«×¡B´²«×¡B°ò¥»¾É¼Æ
Kinematics of a Fluid Element: Convection, Strain Rates, Vorticity and Rotationality, Divergence, Substantial Derivative
¨Ò¤l¡GµL±Û©MµL§ÎÅÜÁ³±Û¬y¡A¤Î¨ä©M¹ê»Ú¦ÛµM´õ¬yªºÃö«Y
Example: Irrotational and Zero Strain Swirling Flows, Relationship to Physical Vortices
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò2:
Project Lab 2:
±MÃD·§­z
Overview of Project
°Q½×´Á¤¤³ø§iªº­n¨D
Discuss Current Requirements for Interim Report
¤À²Õ
Distribute Team Assignments
¦¬¶°¹ï­·¬}´ú¸Õ®É¶¡ªº¦w±Æ
Collect Wind Tunnel Testing Times
5 µ²§ô§ÎÅÜ¡B´²«×©M±Û«×ªº°Q½×
Finish Discussion of Strain, Divergence, and Rotationality
·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡G¤£¥iÀ£¬yªº¬yÅé·L¹Îªº¹B°Ê
Concept Question: Incompressible Fluid Element Motion
¶}©l°Q½×¤û¹yªºÀ³¤O¡ÐÀ³ÅÜÃö«Y,¥]¬A¼Ð°OºD¨Ò©M¹ïºÙÀ³¤O(£nxy = £nyx)
Begin Discussion of Newtonian Stress-strain Relationship including Sign Convention and Need for Symmetric Stresses (tau_xy = tau_yx)
·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡GºÞ¹D¤¤¬yÅé²bÖߩʤOªº¥¿½T¹Bºâ¦¡
Concept Question on Correct Expression for Net Viscous Forces on the Fluid in a Channel
6 µ²§ôÀ³¤O¡ÐÀ³ÅÜÃö«Y¦¡ªº°Q½×
Finish Discussion of Stress-strain Relationship
¥æ§@·~¡­2
Homework #2 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­3
Homework #3 Out
7 °Q½×Stokes°²³]©M°Ê¶q¶Ç¿éªº¤À¤l°Ê¤O¾Ç­ì²z
Discussion of Stokes Hypothesis and Molecular Source of Momentum Transport
ÂX´²¹CÀ¸
Play Diffusion Game
±MÃD¥æ¬yµªºÃ·|3¡G
Project Lab 3:
¤¶²Ð´õ®æªk¨Ã¥Ü½dAVL¡]´õ®æªkÀ³¥Î¡^
Introduce Vortex Lattice Methods and Begin Demonstration of AVL
8 °Q½×¿n¤À©M·L¤À§Î¦¡ªº¥iÀ£¬yªºNavier-Stokes¤èµ{¦¡
Discussion of Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations in Integral and Differential Form
·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡G¬yÅé·L¹Îªº¥[³t«×¶q¯Å¡B²bÀ£¤O©M²bÖߩʤOªº¥­¿Å
Concept Questions: Magnitude of Acceleration vs Net Pressure Force vs Net Viscous Force on a Fluid Element
9 ªi­µ¤½¥qBob LiebeckªºÁ¿®y¡G¡uÁl¨­¿Ä¦X³]­pªº¬D¾Ô¡v
Guest Lecture by Bob Liebeck, Boeing Company/MIT, on "BWB Design Challenges"
¥æ§@·~¡­3
Homework #3 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­4
Homework #4 Out
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò4:
Project Lab 4:
µ²§ôAVLªº¥Ü½d
Finish Demonstration of AVL
³Ì«á¤@­Ó¤p®É¶i¦æ¤p²Õ¤u§@·|ij
Group Work Session During Last Hour
10 ¥Î¨â­Ó±ÛÂà¶êµ©¶¡¬yÅé¬y°Êªº¯S¨Ò¡A°Q½×¤£¥iÀ£ÖߩʬyÅ骺¸Ñ
Discussion of Incompressible Viscous Flow Solutions Giving Specific Example of Between Two Rotating Cylinders
Á¿¸Ñ±±¨î¤èµ{¦¡²Õªº¼h¦¸Åé¨t
Presentation of Hierarchy of Governing Equations
11 ¨â­ÓºtÁ¿¡G
Two Lectures Scheduled Today:

¤£¥iÀ£¶Õ¬yªº°ò¥»°²³]©M·§©À¡GµL±Û¡B½è¶q¦u«í¡B½è¶q¦u«í¤èµ{¦¡ªº½u©Ê¤Î³t«×ªº½u©Ê¡Ad¡¦Alemberts®¯½×¡AKutta Joukowsky©w²z¡A¥H¤ÎKutta±ø¥ó
Discussion of Basic Assumptions and Concepts in Incompressible Potential Flow: Irrotationality, Conservation of Mass, Linearity with Respect to Velocity and Conservation of Mass, d'Alemberts Paradox, Kutta Joukowsky Theorem, and the Kutta Condition

´X­Ó·§©À°ÝÃD¡G¶Õ¬yªºµL±Û»P½è¶q¦u«í¡A³t«×ªº½u©ÊÅ|¥[»P©MÀRÀ£¡A¶ê¬WÅé©MÁl«¬Â¶¬yªºd¡¦Alembert®¯½×¡AKutta Joukowsky©w²z»PKutta±ø¥ó
Concept Questions: Irrotationality versus Conservation of Mass for a Potential Flow, Linearity of Velocity versus Static Pressure, d'Alembert's Paradox for Cylinder and Airfoil, Kutta-Joukowsky vs Kutta Condition
¥æ§@·~¡­4
Homework #4 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­5
Homework #5 Out
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò5:
Project Lab 5:
¤p²Õ¤u§@·|ij
Group Work Session
12 ¥»´Á¨S¦³Á¿½Ò¦]¬°¤W´Á¤w¸g¦³¨â¦¸Á¿½Ò
No lecture today since two lectures were held on Lec #11
13 °Q½×´õ­±ªk
Discussion of Vortex Panel Method
14 Á¡Ál²z½×¤¶²Ð
Introduction to Thin Airfoil Theory
¥æ§@·~¡­5
Homework #5 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­6
Homework #6 Out
±MÃD¥æ¬yµªºÃ·|6¡G
Project Lab 6:
CFD¡]­pºâ¬yÅé°Ê¤O¾Ç¡^ªº¤¶²Ð
Introduction to CFD
Fluent³nÅé¨Ï¥ÎªºÂ²µu¥Ü½d
Short Demo on the Use of Fluent
15 Á¡Ál²z½×¦b«e½t©M«á½tÃÌÁl¤WªºÀ³¥Î
Application of Thin Airfoil Theory to Leading-edge and Trailing-edge Flaps
¨Ï¥Î«e½t©M«á½tÃÌÁlªº¥Øªº
Purpose of Leading-edge and Trailing-edge Flaps
«e½t§l¤O®p­È¤Î¨ä»PÁ¡Ál«¬©Mªï¨¤ªºÃö«Y
Leading-edge Suction Peak and Relation to Thin Airfoils and Incidence
16 Á¡Ál²z½×¦b´£°ªÀRºAí©w©Ê¤è­±ªºÀ³¥Î
Application of Thin Airfoil Theory to Improving Static Stability
«á½t¤Ï§é
Reflex Trailing Edges
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò7¡G
Project Lab 7:
¤p²Õ¤u§@·|ij
Group Work Session
17 µ²§ô¦³ÃöÀRºAí©w©Ê©M«á½t¤Ï§éªºÁl«¬³]­pªº°Q½×
Finish Discussion of Designing Airfoils for Static Stability and Reflexed Trailing Edges
¤É¤O½uªº¤¶²Ð
Introduction to Lifting Line
·§©À©Êªº°ÝÃD¡G¤É¤O¡A¤É¤O¤À§G©M»¤¾Éªý¤O¤§¶¡ªºÃö«Y
Concept Questions: Relationship Between Lift, Lift Distribution, and Induced Drag
¥æ§@·~¡­6
Homework #6 Due
18 ¤É¤O½u¤èªk±o¥Xªºµ²ªGªº°Q½×
Discussion of Lifting Line Results
®i©¶¤ñ¹ï»¤¾Éªý¤O©M¤É¤Oªº¼vÅT
Impact of Aspect Ratio on Induced Drag and Lift
´X¦ó§Îª¬¹ïÁl®i®ÄÀ³ªº¼vÅT
Impact of Geometry on Span Efficiency
»¤¾Éªý¤OªºTrefftz¥­­±¤ÀªR
Trefftz Plane Analysis of Induced Drag
19 µ²§ôÃö©ó¤É¤O½u¤èªkªº°Q½×
Finish Discussion of Lifting Line
¾÷Ál§áÂ઺¼vÅT
Impact of Twist
¤£¨Ï¥Î¾ò¶ê¥­­±§Îª¬ªº¾÷Ál¦p¦ó±o¨ì¾ò¶ê§Îªº¤É¤O¤À§G
Achieving Elliptic Lift Distribution without Elliptic Planform
±MÃD¥æ¬yµªºÃ·|8¡G
Project Lab 8:
¤p²Õ¤u§@®É¶¡
Group Work Time
20 ¹ï¤É¤O½u²z½×ªº¥D­nµ²½×°µ¤@­ÓÁ`µ²
Summarize Lifting Line Main Conclusions
¶}©l°Q½×­·¬}¸ÕÅç©M¬y°Ê¬Û¦ü©Ê
Begin Discussion of Wind Tunnel Testing and Flow Similarity
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­7
Homework #7 Out
21 µ²§ô¬y°Ê¬Û¦ü©Ê¤Î¨ä¦b­·¬}¸ÕÅ礤À³¥Îªº°Q½×
Finish Discussion of Flow Similarity and Application to Wind Tunnel Testing
¶}©l°Q½×­·¬}¬}¾À¤zÂZ®ÄÀ³
Begin Discussion of Wind Tunnel Wall Effects
22 µ²§ôÃö©ó¦a­±®ÄÀ³©M­·¬}¬}¾À¤zÂZ®ÄÀ³ªºÃè¹³¤ÀªRªº°Q½×
Finish Discussion of Image Analysis for Ground Effect and Tunnel Wall Effects
¶}©l°Q½×¤f¸Õªºµ²ªG
Begin Discussion of Results from Oral Exam
¥æ§@·~¡­7
Homework #7 Due
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò9¡G
Project Lab 9:
¤p²Õ¤u§@®É¶¡
Group Work Time
23 °Q½×¹B¥Îªk¦V°Ê¶q¤èµ{¦¡±o¨ìªºÅs«×©M«p«×¹ïÁl«¬À£¤O¤À§Gªº¼vÅT(§Ydp/dr = rho V^2/R)
Discussion of the Effect of Camber and Thickness on Pressure Distribution Over an Airfoil Using Normal Momentum Equation (i.e. dp/dr = rho V^2/R)
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­8
Homework #8 Out
24 ±q´X­Ó·§©À©Êªº°ÝÃD¶}©l°Q½×Ãä¬É¼hªº·§©À¡C°ÝÃD¥]¬AÃä¬É¼h¤ºªºÀ£¤O¯S¼x¡BÃä¬É¼hªº¦s¦b¹ï¾ãÅéÀ£¤Oªº¼vÅT¡B¼h¬yÁl«¬¤W¼¯À¿¤OÀH©¶¦V¶ZÂ÷ªºÅܤơC
Begin discussion of boundary layer concept using several concept questions on the behavior of pressure through boundary layer, the effect of the boundary layer on the pressure, and the behavior of the skin friction vs chord-wise distance on a laminar airfoil
¥æ±MÃD³ø§i
Project Report Due
25 ¤¶²ÐÃä¬É¼hªº¶q¯Å¹ï¤ñ¤ÀªRªk
Introduction of order of magnitude scaling analysis for boundary layers
¥Î¦¹ªk±À¾É¥XÃä¬É¼h¤èµ{¦¡²Õ
Derivation of boundary layer equations using scaling analysis
26 ¤¶²ÐÃä¬É¼hªº±±¨îÅé¤èªk¡A¥Î©ó°Q½×¦³Ãöªº°ò¥»ªº¾÷²z¡A¤×¨ä¬O¾À­±¼¯À¿©MÀ£¤O±è«×¾É­Pªº°Ê¶qÅܤÆ
Introduction of control volume analysis of a boundary layer to discuss basic mechanisms involved: specifically, wall friction and pressure gradients resulting in momentum changes
°Q½×¬y°Ê¤ÏÂà¡B¤ÀÂ÷©Ò»Ýªº°fÀ£±è«×
Discussion of need for adverse pressure gradient for flow reversal/separation to occur
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­9
Homework #9 Out
¥æ§@·~¡­8
Homework #8 Due
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò10¡G
Project Lab 10:
¤p²Õ¤u§@®É¶¡
Group Work Time
27 ¤¶²Ð¿n¤À§Î¦¡ªºÃä¬É¼h°Ñ¼Æ©M¤èµ{¦¡²Õ¡A¥]¬A¦ì²¾©M°Ê¶q«p«×
Introduction of integral boundary layer parameters and equations including displacement and momentum thickness
¥Ü½d¥Ñ©óÃä¬É¼h«p«×·½°_ªºÀ£®tªý¤O
Demonstration of pressure drag source due to boundary layer thickness
28 ªí­±¼¯À¿©M¼¯À¿ªý¤O»P¹p¿Õ¼Æ¤§¶¡Ãö«Y
Basic behavior of skin friction and friction drag with respect to Reynolds number
·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡G¦Û¥Ñ¬y³t«×ÅܤƩM¬y¦V¤è¦ì¡]¦p©¶ªø¡^ªºÅܤƤް_ªºªý¤OÅܤÆ
Concept question: behavior of drag due to changes in freestream velocity and streamwise orientation (i.e. chord length)
¥æ§@·~¡­9
Homework #9 Due
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò11
Project Lab 11
29 ¥Î¹êÅç©Î¥é¯u±o¨ìªºµøÄ±¤Æ¬y°Ê¡A°Q½×¯¿¬yªº¦æ¬°
Discussion of the behavior of turbulent flows using flow visualizations from experiments and simulations
¥Ü½d¼h¬y¡B¼h¬y¤£Ã­©w¡BÂà´«¡B¯¿¬yªº®t§O¡A¯S§O±j½Õ¼h¬y¡]¤p¤Ø«×¡^²V¦X©M¯¿¬y¡]¤j¤Ø«×¡^²V¦Xªº¹ï¤ñ
Demonstration of the difference between laminar, laminar unsteady, transitional, and turbulent flow stressing laminar (i.e. microscopic) mixing versus turbulent (i.e. macroscopic) mixing
30 °Q½×ÀHµÛ¹p¿Õ¼Æªº¼W¥[¡AÁl«¬¤WªºÃä¬É¼hªºÅܤÆ
Discussion of the behavior of the boundary layer on airfoils as Reynolds number increases
¼h¬y¡BÂà´«©M¯¿¬y¡GÂà´«¤¤ªí­±¼¯À¿ªº¦æ¬°ÅܤÆ
Laminar, transition, and turbulent flows: behavior of skin friction in transition
¨Ï¥Îe^N¤èªk±o¨ìªºÂà´«¼Ò«¬¡]¶È­­©ó½u©Ê¤£Ã­©wÃä¬É¼h©M¾É­PÂà´«ªºÂZ°Ê©ñ¤jªº°ò¥»«ä·Q¡^
Transition modeling through e^N method (only basic idea of linearly unstable boundary layers and amplification of disturbances leading to transition)
31 ¥Î±±¨îÅéªk©Mµ¥æi²¤Æ¡A±À¾É¥X¥iÀ£¤@ºûºÞ¹D¬y°Êªº¤èµ{¦¡
Derivation of compressible 1-D channel flow equations using a control volume analysis and reduction to isentropic form of equations
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­10
Homework #10 Out
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò12
Project Lab 12
32 ¨Ï¥Î­ã¤@ºû¼Ú©Ô¸Ñ¥Ü½d¦b¤@­Ó¦¬ÁY¡ÐÂX±i¼Q¼L¤¤¡A¥Ñ©ó¤U´åªºÀ£¤O­°§C¦Ó¤Þ°_ªº¿EªiªºÅܤƹLµ{
Demonstration of the evolution of a shock wave as the downstream pressure is lowered for a converging-diverging nozzle using a quasi-1D Euler solver
°Q½×³o­Ó¹Lµ{¤¤¤£¦Pªº¬y°Ê¦æ¬°¡Gµ¥æi¨È­µ³t¬y¡B¼Q¼L¤¤¦³¿Eªiªº¸ó­µ³t¬y¡B¦b¥X¤f¦³¿Eªiªº¸ó­µ³t¬y¡Bµ¥æi¨È­µ³t¬y¨ì±a¿Eªi©Î¼Q¼L¥~¦³¿±µÈªiªº¶W­µ³t¬y
Discussion of different behaviors of this flow: isentropic subsonic, transonic with shock inside nozzle, transonic with shock at exit plane, isentropic subsonic-to-supersonic with shocks or expansion fans outside of nozzle
33 ¤@ºû¥iÀ£¬y¤¤ªºªi°Ê¤¶²Ð¡]Ánªi©Mæiªi¡^
Introduction to waves in 1-D compressible flow (acoustic and entropy waves)
±À¾É«D½u©Êªº¿Eªi¸õÂàÃö«Y
Derivation of nonlinear shock jump relationships
¬ï¹L¿Eªi®É¦UºØ¬y°ÊÄݩʪºÅܤơA¥]¬A°¨»®¼Æ¡BÀ£¤O¡BÁ`À£¤O¡BÖU¡Bæi
Behavior of properties (Mach number, pressure, total pressure, enthalpy, entropy) across a shock
¥æ§@·~¡­10
Homework #10 Due
¤½¥¬§@·~¡­11
Homework #11 Out
34 ¥Î½u©Ê¤Æ¡]§Y¤£­p¤G¶¥¤p¶q¡^±±¨îÅéªk¡A®Ú¾Ú½è¶q¦u«í±À¾É¥X­µ³t¤j¤p¡C
Derivation of speed of sound using linearized control volume analysis
§â¾Ç¥Í­Ì¤À¬°´X­Ó¤p²Õ¡A¿W¥ß§¹¦¨±À¾É¡C
Manipulation of the conservation of mass, with students placed into teams to complete the derivation themselves
Ãö©óµ¥æi±ø¥ó©M³Ì²×µ²ªGªºÁ¿®y
Presentation of isentropic condition and final results
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò13
Project Lab 13
35 ªi¦b¥­­±¥iÀ£¬y°Ê¤¤ªº¶Ç¼½¡G¨È­µ³t©M¶W­µ³tªº¤ñ¸û
Behavior of waves in two-dimensional compressible flows: subsonic vs. supersonic
°¨»®¨¤
Mach angle
¥æ§@·~¡­11
Homework #11 Due
36 ¨È­µ³t¥iÀ£¬y
Subsonic compressible flow
Prandtl-Glauert ÅÜ´«²v¡A¤Î¨È­µ³t¬y¤¤À£¤O«Y¼Æ¡B¤É¤O«Y¼Æ©Mªý¤O«Y¼ÆªºÅܤÆ
Prandtl-Glauert scaling and behavior of pressure coefficient, lift coefficient, and drag coefficient in subsonic flow
°Q½×¨È­µ³t«DÖߩʬyªºd¡¦Alembert®¯½×¡]±N·|¨Ï¥Î¨ìÃö©ó³o¨Ç¸ÜÃDªº¤£¦Pªº·§©À©Ê°ÝÃD¡^
Discussion of d'Alembert's paradox for subsonic inviscid flows (various concept questions on these topics will be used)
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò14
Project Lab 14
37 °Q½×¶W­µ³t½u©Ê¤Æ¶Õ¬y
Discussion of supersonic linearized potential flow
°Q½×§@·~¤¤ªº±×­±°ÝÃD¡F¶W­µ³t½u©Ê¶Õ¬y¦bÁl«¬¤É¤O©Mªý¤O¤WªºÀ³¥Î
Discussion on ramp problem given in homework; application to airfoil lift and drag
38 µ²§ô¦b½u©Ê¶W­µ³t¬y¤¤ªºÁl«¬¤É¤O©Mªý¤Oªº°Q½×
Finish discussion of airfoil lift and drag in linearized supersonic flow
¥Ü½d¤É¤O¥u¨Ì¿àªï¨¤¡]¤£¨Ì¿àÅs«×¡^
Demonstration of dependence of lift only on angle of attack (not on camber)
Á{¬É°¨»®¼Æ
Critical Mach number
¸ó­µ³t¤Uªºªý¤Oµo´²
Drag divergence at transonic conditions
¦b¸ó­µ³t®Éªº¼¯À¿ªý¤O¡B¿Eªiªý¤O©MÀ£®tªý¤Oªº¤ñ¨Ò²Ó¤À
Breakdown of friction, wave, and pressure drag through transonic speeds
39 °Q½×«á±°²z½×©MÁ{¬É°¨»®¼Æªº©µ¿ð
Discussion of sweep theory and delay of the critical Mach number
´Á¥½¦Ò¸Õªº·Ç³Æ
Comments on preparing for final exam
±MÃD¹ê°È¥æ¬y½Ò15
Project Lab 15

 
MIT Home
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Terms of Use Privacy