MIT OpenCourseWare


» 进阶搜寻
 课程首页
 教学大纲
 教学时程
 相关阅读资料
 课堂讲稿
 作业

教学大纲


本页翻译进度

灯号说明

审定:无
翻译:林海威(简介并寄信)
编辑:许馨文(简介并寄信)

说明

全球各地,有组织的都市房地产拥有者,正以国家主权去设计一个新政府模式以保护其利益。经由此力量来征税及提供共同的服务,倡导的人主张商业改善区域可有效地维护户外公共场所的清洁及安全。相较之下,我们更应该检查此种公开捐赠、私人管理的机构,及质疑他们对政治、经济、社会所做贡献与对都市空间破坏的程度。

为了要完整的探讨此主题,本课程包含了三个不同的部份。首先,我们会使用政策网络理论为架构,来评估商业改善区域组织在不同背景中的表现、成果、及互相关联。一开始我们将问以下的问题:这些组织为何、如何发展?何种情况能为商业改善区域政策的表现与成果作最佳说明?在政策传递当中那一个政策网络要件是特别有助益的?为了能有系统的介绍分析,我们将靠个案分析的帮忙,就三个城市:多伦多 (Toronto)、费城 (Philadelphia) 及开普敦 (Cape Town)的经验作深入研讨。另外,我们将观察不同的历史背景及组织架构如何孕育特定的商业改善区域模式,与如何阻碍其他模式的产生。

在本课程第二部分开始时,我们将暂时停下脚步,来了解这个广泛使用于都市复兴的策略所包含的基本原理。这包括简单回顾与都市环境相关的社会学理论。有了对这些城市的商业改善区域组织为何发展出来及其模式的较佳概念,我们将严谨地评量它们潜在的利与弊。此课程这个部份会以欧洲、亚洲与澳洲中类似的体制综观作结。

第三部份则使学员有机会思考一些与商业改善区域观念应用有关的主题。波士顿 (Boston) 中央交通干线通道计划即将实现,各方领导人士已公开宣布有意愿赞助商业改善区域,并监督此建议的公共场所之养护和经营。基于从课程习得其他城市之经验,学员将评估州政府未结之法案,及提出含括对交通干道商业委员会 (Artery Business Committee, ABC)明确建议之报告。学员应注意此建议未来将刊登在boston.com (http://www.boston.com/beyond_bigdig/)网页上,将可能对这世界著名计划之成果作修改。最后,此课程将以商业改善区域的未来,与其在住宅区与工业区中的表现讨论作结。



评分方式

上课出席占10%
此课程的好与坏全在于你的投入。我非常的希望我们能享受研讨此课题的过程并且了解彼此。如因为生病或是有紧急事情而必须缺课时,超过一堂课的话你必须事先告知我。
作业 1,拟定易解之定义 占10%。
作业 2,短篇研究报告 占35%。
作业 3,评论商业改善区域的好与坏 (“商业改善区域,是敌是友?”)占20%。
作业 4,综合课程所学:对波士顿 (Boston)市的建议报告 占25%。

研读资料与作业时程表
(英文PDF)、 (英文DOC)




Description

Organized urban property owners in contexts throughout the globe are using state authority to create a new form of government to protect their interests. With the power to impose taxes and provide collective services, proponents claim that business improvement districts (BIDs) effectively clean and secure outdoor public spaces. In contrast, it is important to examine the proliferation of such publicly endowed and privately managed organizations and question the extent to which they contribute to the political, economic, social and spatial fragmentation of the urban realm.

To fully explore this topic, this course consists of three distinct parts. First, we will use policy network theory as a framework by which to assess the emergence, success and implications of BID organizations in different contexts. To begin, we will ask the following questions. Why and how do such organizations develop? What conditions best explain the emergence and success of the BID policies? Which policy network actors are particularly instrumental in the process of policy transfer? To formulate explanations, we will rely on case studies, detailing the experiences of three cities, Toronto, Philadelphia, and Cape Town. Additionally, we will observe how divergent histories and institutional arrangements of the contexts foster specific types of BID programs and hinder others.

At the start of the second part of the course, we will pause to examine the rationale underlying this popular approach to urban revitalization. This will include a brief review the sociological theories related to the implications of the urban environment. With a better sense of why BID organizations develop and the types of programs they support, we will critically evaluate their potential advantages and disadvantages. This portion of the course ends with a review of similar schemes in Europe, Asia, and Australia.

Part three provides an opportunity for students to consider the issues associated with the application of the BID concept. As Boston's central artery corridor project becomes a reality, a variety of leaders have publicly declared an interest in implementing a BID to fund and oversee the maintenance and operation of the proposed public spaces. Based on lessons learned in other cities, students will evaluate the Commonwealth's pending legislation and craft a report containing specific recommendations for consideration by the Artery Business Committee (ABC). You should know in advance that your recommendations will be posted on boston.com (http://www.boston.com/beyond_bigdig/), and have the ability to alter the outcome of this world renowned project. Finally, the course will conclude with a discussion on the future of BIDs as well as the emergence of their residential and industrial counterparts.



Grading

Attendance and Participation (10%)
The quality of this course depends on your contribution. It is my best hope that we will enjoy the process of exploring this topic and getting to know one another. While it is reasonable to miss a session due to illness or emergency, you must notify me in advance if you will be absent more than once.
Assignment 1, Crafting a Comprehensive Definition (10%)
Assignment 2, A Short Research Paper (35%)
Assignment 3, The Business Improvement District, Friend or Foe? (20%)
Assignment 4, Synthesis of Lessons Learned: Recommendations for the City of Boston (25%)




Schedule of Readings and Assignments (PDF)




 
MIT Home
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Terms of Use Privacy