MIT OpenCourseWare


» 进阶搜寻
 课程首页
 教学大纲
 教学时程
 相关阅读资料
 课堂讲稿
 作业
 专题
 下载课程

教学大纲


本页翻译进度

灯号说明

审定:无
翻译:"盛振中(简介并寄信)
编辑:王新建(简介并寄信)


简介

本课程主要向处于第一学期的MCP学生介绍规划人员面临的持久的主题和挑战。课程的目标是:
  • 激发学生对专业的兴趣;
  • 为规划师思考将采用的行动提供一个理论框架;
  • 向学生介绍规划领域里一些非常有趣和具有挑战性的理论争论;
  • 促使学生思考如何充分利用时间以保证他们的职业发展;

安排

课程由五个单元组成:
第一单元:介绍规划文献中的一些经典著作;
第二到第四单元以波斯顿、墨西哥和鹿特丹规划实例为基础。每个单元使用四节课。第一节课包括一个两小时的关于实例的陈述;第二节课由学生分组讨论实例;第三节课,将由5到6个学生组成一个团队,以实例推荐者拟出的大纲为基础,向大家介绍团队计划;第四节课,学生再一次聚会,讨论团队计划。每个学生将参与一个团队计划,这将贯穿整个学期的课程。每个单元结束之时,没有参与团队陈述的学生需要交一个五页的报告,根据第一单元的初步规划行动框架评述实例。
第五单元将是一个总结课。着眼于城市规划职业的未来,同时包括一个随堂考试,来评估(学生)对必读材料的掌握程度。

考核

每个学生的成绩将依据以下方面确定:

  • 个人的团队陈述和项目计划;
  • 两个必需的独立报告的表现;
  • 课堂和网络的表现;
  • 期末考试成绩;

补充

本课程将充分网络课堂提供的资源。大家必须经常参考大纲中更新的课程大纲、阅读书目和作业。所有的阅读资料都可以通过网络下载得到。课堂上介绍的资料也将发布在网上。同时,(我们)鼓励大家使用网站的论坛功能延续课堂上的讨论。

根据往届MCP学生的建议,每六到七个学生被随机分为一组。每个小组的第一个同学作为该组的协调人。我们鼓励大家在私人时间会面(一周一次,一次一小时或者大家选择合适的时间安排),讨论分配阅读任务、小组陈述、报告、作业,作为一个支持团队。这些环节和课堂讨论和小组讨论是分开的,也是不同的。本课提纲的末尾将提供学习研讨会的作业(在线)。在同一页中,每个名字之前还由一个数字(从1到4)。这表示学生分配到课堂讨论的节数。

一个签名册在第一堂课上将开始使用。每个学生必须签名加入一个团队。将有四个团队(每个团队5到6人)分别准备各个实例的报告。没有签名的学生将被随机分到一个团队。第二节课,团队的计划列表将发布在课堂网站上。在每个单元的第三节课,团队有30分钟时间(包括10分钟提问和讨论)来陈述自己的计划。团队应该与课程助教协同工作,以保证陈述当天下午两点以前,陈述(材料)能够在网站上发布。我们极力推荐在课堂陈述以前,材料能够上网发布。课程结尾,希望每个小组以课题陈述为基础提交一份简要总结。

没有参加小组项目的学生提交一份关于该单元的独立作业。课程网站上提供详细的作业指导。报告必须在下一个单元的第一堂课前交给助教。迟交的作业若无充分理由将不予接受。



课程概况

第一单元:框架: 行动

这堂导论性的课概括描述了思考规划行动的理论框架。将从七步规划实践模型规划材料中向大家介绍经典著作。

七步规划实践模型
思考规划实践的进退两难的选择

第二单元:综合的邻里规划: 波斯顿南端的行动

本实例主要包括20世纪60年代早期,在波斯顿南端进行过的旧城更新规划。在这个过程从物质和精神方面重塑邻里关系的努力,是在全市范围内使用联邦基金进行城市更新的一部分,包括中心城和郊区,这样的城市更新是“复兴波斯顿”途径之一。邻里规划以前的“波斯顿复兴”法案必须清理旧址。但是居住和商业规划要求涉及居民邻里制度。波斯顿南端规划小组面临的挑战是如何使居民和其他的资金持有者参与到建设性和支持的规划过程中来。

波斯顿(南端)
课堂讨论(见在线讨论问题)
团队陈述(见在线指导)
课堂讨论(见在线讨论问题)
课前独立作业

第三单元:谁是这儿的人质? 墨西哥城机场选址处的规划者、农民和政治家

2001年10月,墨西哥通信和交通部部长宣布联邦政府决定在墨西哥城东北30里的农田修建一个新的机场。农民的抗议引起了国内外媒体的关注,最后,迫使总统取消了这个计划,另在城市的其他地方考虑机场选址,这使私人开发者和那些极力赞同计划的人感到非常沮丧。这一个单元,我们以实例来讨论市民抗议的可能性和局限性,包括从政府的三个层次考虑都市区域规划面临的挑战,包括地方、区域和国家发展目标的权衡,还包括规划人员、政治家和私人之间关系以及在规划过程中相对于政治和社会标准的技术的应用。

墨西哥城的机场
课堂讨论(见在线讨论问题)
团队陈述(见在线指导)
课堂讨论(见在线讨论问题)
课前独立作业

第四单元:鹿特丹的可持续发展:规划或创新

荷兰致力于实现可持续性发展的努力的特点表现为好几个冲突。第一个是传统规划发展和正在进行的规划和改革要求的可持续性发展之间的冲突。第二个是形式化的规划实践和创新网络不协调导致的“制度空缺”(Hajer),创新网络考虑了现实暴露的问题。第三个是新阶层(特别是移民)与核心社会价值拥护者之间的社会紧张关系产生的分裂,核心社会价值观强调荷兰加强社会、经济和实体规划。最后,规划和发展在综合需求的促使下形成,综合需求考虑了全球以及欧洲政治和经济网络的(影响),同时也提升了当地股东的期望值,他们从地方角度作决策和行动,这直接关系到他们的日常生活。在这个单元,我们将看到规划和改革对一个干预设计的建议,这个干预可以实事求是地考虑目前面临压力,提高城市的可持续性发展能力和宜居性。

鹿特丹的可持续性发展
课堂讨论(见在线讨论问题)
团队陈述(见在线指导)
课堂讨论(见在线讨论问题)
课前独立报告

第五单元:以规划者作为职业生涯的安排

规划教育的内容和形式应该充分反映出规划人员应有的作用和责任以及需要熟练掌握的技巧(和分析能力)。入门课程的这个部分将为我们提供这样一个机会,让我们形成对于以上论题的观点。在实践周里,来自五个部门的从业者将与学生交流,介绍他们的工作。我们的目标是促使学生努力思考他们在麻省理工学院如何安排未来的两年时间。

城市研究与规划系项目组的陈述
校友联谊晚会-见在线计划
规划教育的思考
随堂期末考试
班级评估
团队项目的论文以及电子文档


Description

This class introduces first semester MCP students to the persistent themes and challenges facing planners. The goals of this class are:
  • to excite students about their chosen profession;
  • to offer a theoretical framework for thinking about the kinds of interventions that planners are expected to take;
  • to introduce students to some of the most interesting and challenging theoretical debates in the planning field; and
  • to press students to think about the best way of using their time to ensure their own personal professional development.

Format

The class consists of 5 units. Unit I introduces some classics from the planning literature. Units II, III and IV are based on case-studies of Boston, Mexico City and Rotterdam. Each of these units will last 4 classes. The first class will consist of a 2-hour presentation of the case; the second class will meet in sections for students to discuss the case. In the third class, groups of 5 or 6 students will present a group project to the class, based on guidelines set out by the case-study presenter. In the fourth class, the class again meets in sections to discuss the group projects. Each student will participate in one group project over the course of the term. At the end of each unit, students who did not give a group presentation will submit a 5 page memo commenting on the case in light of the initial planning action framework presented in the 1st unit. Unit V will provide a course wrap-up, focus on the future of the profession of city planning and will also include an in-class final to evaluate mastery of the required readings.

Evaluation

Each student's grade will be based on

  • his or her team presentation and project,
  • performance on the two required individual memos,
  • in class and on-line participation, and
  • performance in the final.

Logistics

This class will take advantage of the resources provided by the class website. It is your responsibility to consult it regularly for updates in the syllabus, reading list, and assignments. All the readings for the class will be available for download from the website. Also, all materials presented in class will be posted on the site. The website also has a discussion forum capability which you are encouraged to use to continue class discussions.

At the suggestion of previous MCP students, students have randomly been assigned to study groups of 6 or 7 students. The first student in each of these groups is its coordinator. These groups are encouraged to meet on their own time (once a week for an hour, or as they see fit) to discuss assigned readings, group presentations, memo assignments and to serve as a small support group. These sections are separate and different from both class discussion sections and project groups. The study group assignment can be found at the end of this syllabus, on-line. On the same sheet, you will find a number (from 1 to 4) before each name. This refers to the section you have been assigned to for in-class discussion.

A project sign-up sheet will be circulated on the first class. Every student must sign-up for one project group. There will be 4 groups (of 5 and 6 students) preparing reports on each case study. Students who do not fill out this sheet in class will be randomly assigned to a project group. By the second class, the finalized listing of project groups will be available on the class website. Groups will be allotted 30 minutes (including 10 minutes for questions/discussion) for their presentation during the 3rd class for their unit. Project groups are responsible for working with the course TAs to make sure that their presentation is available on the course website no later than 2pm on the day of their presentation. It is highly recommended that the presentation be online prior to it being given in class. At the end of the course, the project groups are expected to submit a full write-up based on their in-class presentation.

Students not involved in a group project will be responsible for submitting individual assignments on that unit. The detailed assignment guidelines will be available on the course website. The assignment must be handed in to the Gateway TAs at the beginning of the class marking the beginning of the next unit. Late assignments will not be accepted without a reasonable justification.



Course Outline

UNIT I: The Framework: Taking Action

The introductory lectures outline a theoretical framework for thinking about planning action. Students will be introduced to some classics from the planning literature in the context of a seven-step model of planning practice.

A Seven-Step Model of Planning Practice
Key Dilemmas in Thinking About Planning Practice

UNIT II: Comprehensive Neighborhood Planning: Taking Action In Boston's South End

The case will focus on the urban renewal planning process undertaken in Boston's South End during the early l960's. That process, a comprehensive effort to revitalize the neighborhood both physically and socially was part of a city-wide effort to use the federally-funded urban renewal process as a way of "turning around" Boston- both its Downtown and its neighborhoods. The Boston Redevelopment Authority's (BRA) previous approach to neighborhood planning had been to clear the site. But planning for residential and commercial rehabilitation required the active involvement of residents and neighborhood institutions. The challenge confronting the South End planning team is how to engage residents and other "stakeholders" in a productive and supportive planning process.

Boston (South End)
Class Discussion (See Discussion Questions Online)
Group Presentations (See Guidelines Online)
Class Discussion (See Discussion Questions Online)
Individual Assignments due at Beginning of Class

UNIT III: Who's the Hostage Here? Planners, Peasants, and Politicians in the Sitting of the Mexico City Airport

In October 2001 Mexico's Secretary of Communications and Transport announced the Federal Government's decision to build a new state-of the-art airport on agricultural lands 30 miles northeast of Mexico City. Peasant protest -- which involved a national and international media campaign and, ultimately, hostage-taking -- pushed the President to cancel the plan and consider other sites in the metropolitan area, much to the dismay of private sector developers and others who strongly promoted the project. In this unit, we use this case study to ask questions about the possibilities and limits of citizen protest, about the challenges of planning for a metropolitan region cross-cut by three levels of government, about the dilemma of balancing local, regional and national development aims, about the relationship between planners, politicians, and the private sector, as well as about the use (and abuse) of technical versus political and social criteria in the planning process.

Mexico City - Airport
Class Discussion (See Discussion Questions Online)
Group Presentations (See Guidelines Online)
Class Discussion (See Discussion Questions Online)
Individual Assignments due at Beginning of Class

UNIT IV: Sustainable Development in Rotterdam- Planning or Innovation?

Efforts to achieve sustainable development in the Netherlands are characterized by several conflicts. One is the conflict between the tradition of planned development and the demands sustainability creates for ongoing adaptation, innovation, and learning. The second is the "institutional void" (Hajer) created by the mismatch between the formalized planning practices and the informal networks in which deliberation about emerging problems occurs. A third is the disruption caused by social tensions between new (especially immigrant) communities and the consensus on core social values that has underpinned social, economic, and physical planning in the Netherlands. Finally, planning and development are shaped by the pull of demands for greater integration with global and European political and economic networks and increasing expectations for among stakeholders at the local level to shape the decisions and actions that will affect their lives. In this unit we will look at what planning and innovation suggest for the design of an intervention that can begin to enhance urban sustainability and livability in tangible ways in the face of these tensions.

Sustainable Development in Rotterdam
Class Discussion (See Discussion Questions Online)
Group Presentations (See Guidelines Online)
Class Discussion (See Discussion Questions Online)
Individual Assignments due at Beginning of Class

UNIT V: Composing a Professional Life as a Planner

The content and style of planning education should reflect a clear view of the roles that planners play, the responsibilities they are expected to assume, and the skills (and analytic capabilities) they need to be effective. This section of the Gateway class will provide an opportunity for us to share our views on these topics. The week of panels will bring practitioners from the Department's five program areas to campus to talk with students about their practice. Our goal will be to give students a "boost" in their efforts to think ahead about how they want to use their two years at MIT.

Presentation of DUSP Program Groups
Evening Alumni Panels - see schedule on-line
Thinking about Planning Education
In-class Final
Class Evaluation
Paper and Electronic copy of Group Project.




 
MIT Home
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Terms of Use Privacy