第一步：定义问题
Step1: Define the Problem.

Webber and Rittel. <一般规划理论的两难选择>，《政治科学4》, no.2 (1973): 第155-169.页
Webber and Rittel. "Dilemmas in a general theory of planning." Policy Sciences 4, no.2 (1973): pp. 155-169.

Gans. <公民与规划：城市问题及解决方案的论文>，《消灭城市贫穷的社会和实体规划》第16章，纽约，基本图书公司, 1968, pp. 231-248.
Gans. “People and Plans: Essays on Urban Problems and Solutions.” Chapter 16 in Social and Physical Planning for the Elimination of Urban Poverty. New York: Basic Books Inc., 1968, pp. 231-248.

第二步：界定资金拥有者的利益
Step 2: Map Stakeholder Interests.

Meyerson and Banfield.<政治，规划与公共利益>，《概念性规划的记录》，伦敦: Collier-Macmillan, 1964, pp. 303-329.
Meyerson and Banfield. “Politics, Planning and the Public Interest.” Note on Conceptual Scheme. London: Collier-Macmillan, 1964, pp. 303-329.

第三步：分析变革的制度阻力与压力
Step 3: Analyze Institutional Resistance and Pressures for Reform.

Krumholz. <1969-1979公正规划回顾>.《美国规划协会期刊》48 (1982): pp. 163-174.
Krumholz. "A retrospective view of equity planning 1969-1979." Journal of the American Planning Association 48 (1982): pp. 163-174.

Jacobs. <美国大城市的死与生>,纽约:兰等出版 1961, pp. 415-427.
Jacobs. “Death and Life of Great American Cities.” New York, NY: Random House, 1961, pp. 415-427.

Friedmann. <公共领域的规划: 论述与实践>，《规划教育与研究期刊》8 (1989): pp. 128-130.
Friedmann. "Planning in the Public Domain: discourse and praxis." Journal of Planning Education and Research 8 (1989): pp. 128-130.

第四步:接触资金拥有者
Step 4: Engage the Stakeholders.

Davidoff, Paul. <规划中的倡导与多元性>，《美国规划者协会期刊》31 (1965): pp. 103-114.
Davidoff, Paul. "Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning." Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31 (1965): pp. 103-114.

Peattie. <倡导规划的反馈>,《美国规划者协会期刊》34, no. 2 (1968): pp. 80-88.
Peattie. "Reflections on Advocacy Planning." Journal of the American Institute of Planners 34, no. 2 (1968): pp. 80-88.

Hartman. <荣辱之间: 城市规划四十年>,《城市领域服务项目》.纽约 Brunswick, NJ: 城市政策研究中心, 2002, pp. 367-374.
Hartman. “Between Eminence And Notoriety: Four Decades Of Radical Urban Planning.” The Urban Field Service Program. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, 2002, pp. 367-374.

Abrams. <人们在城市化世界中寻求庇护的抗争>,《Some principles for urban aid》. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1964, pp. 250-252.
Abrams. “Man's Struggle for Shelter in an Urbanizing World.” Some principles for urban aid. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1964, pp. 250-252.

第五步：寻求行动的一致
Step 5: Seek Agreement On What Needs To Be Done.

Kent. <城市总体规划>, 旧金山, 加利福尼亚: Chandler, 1964, [第一章, pp. 12- 26, 第二章, pp. 66-73, pp. 80-86].
Kent. “The Urban General Plan.” San Francisco, CA: Chandler, 1964, [Chapter 1, pp. 12- 26, Chapter 2, pp. 66-73, pp. 80-86].

Altshuler. <城市规划过程: 政治分析>, Ithaca, 纽约: 康奈尔大学出版社, 1969, [pp. 299-304, pp. 311-332].
Altshuler. “The City Planning Process: a Political Analysis.” Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1969, [pp. 299-304, pp. 311-332].

第六步：政策，项目和程序的契约改变
Step 6: Implement Changes in Policies, Programs and Procedures.

Lindblom. <应付的科学>,《公共管理评论》19 (1959): pp. 79-88.
Lindblom. "The Science of Muddling Through." Public Administration Review 19 (1959): pp. 79-88.

Wildavsky.<如果规划包罗万象, 很可能空无一物>,《政策科学》 4 (2) (1973): pp. 127-153.
Wildavsky. "If Planning is everything, Maybe it is Nothing." Policy Sciences 4 (2) (1973): pp. 127-153.

Caro. <政客r: 罗伯特.摩西和纽约的秋天>, Alfred A. Knopf编辑. 纽约, 1974, [pp. 368-379, and pp. 850-884]
Caro. “The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York.” Edited by Alfred A. Knopf. New York, NY, 1974, [pp. 368-379, and pp. 850-884].

第七步：反省，鼓励公众学习，评估
Step 7: Reflect, Encourage Public Learning, Make Assessments.

Schon. <沉思的从业者: 专业人员在行动中的思考方式>, 纽约: Basic图书公司., 1982, [第2章, pp. 21-69, 第7章, pp. 204-235].
Schon. “The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action.” New York, NY: Basic Books Inc., 1982, [Chapter 2, pp. 21-69, Chapter 7, pp. 204-235].


第二单元:波士顿
UNIT II: Boston.

<波斯顿的总体规划:初步报告 1950.>1950, pp. 3, 7, 8.
“General Plan for Boston: Preliminary Report 1950.” 1950, pp. 3, 7, 8.

Kennedy. <山城规划>, Amherst, 艺术硕士: 麻省大学出版社, 1992. [Collins, Logue, and the New Boston, pp. 157-192].
Kennedy. “Planning the City Upon a Hill.” Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 1992. [Collins, Logue, and the New Boston, pp. 157-192].

Keyes.<复原规划竞赛: 邻里关系多样性的研究>, Cambridge, 文学硕士:麻省理工学院出版社, 1969, [第1章. 1-19, and pp. 67-87].
Keyes. “The Rehabilitation Planning Game: A Study in the Diversity of Neighborhood.” Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969, [Chapter One pp. 1-19, and pp. 67-87].

Keyes. <波斯顿南端的城市更新:案例学习：1965/75波斯顿和区域核心的总体规划>，第I章, pp. 1-4，总体规划的作用和本质，和第II章(1998), pp. 7-30 波斯顿实体资产和问题.
Keyes. “Urban Renewal in Boston's South End: Case Study 1965/75 General Plan for the City of Boston and the Regional Core.” The Role and Nature of the General Plan in Chapter I, pp. 1-4 and Boston's Physical Assets and Problems in Chapter II (1998), pp. 7-30.


第三单元：墨西哥
UNIT III: Mexico.

英语和西班牙语网页文章的选择
Selection of web articles in English and Spanish.

Ward. <墨西哥城>, Lincoln, MA: G.K. Hall and Co, 1990, pp.128-134.
Ward. "Mexico City." Lincoln, MA: G.K. Hall and Co, 1990, pp.128-134.

Davis. <墨西哥城: 民主化动力学>,《拉美首府政治: 民主化和授权参与》. Dietz and Meyers.编辑 Lynne Rienner: Boulder, CO, 2002, pp. 241-259.
Davis. “Mexico City: The Local-National Dynamics of Democratization.” In Capital City Politics in Latin America: Democratization and Empowerment. Edited by Dietz and Meyers. Lynne Rienner: Boulder, CO, 2002, pp. 241-259.

Ward and Rodriguez. <墨西哥新联邦制度与州立政府>, 《美国墨西哥州报告》#9, LBJ 公共事务学校, 奥斯汀, 德州: 德州大学, 1999, [pp. 1-4; pp. 21-39; pp. 65-95; pp. 98-126].
Ward and Rodriguez. “New Federalism and State Government in Mexico.” U.S.-Mexico Policy Report #9, LBJ School of Public Affairs, Austin, TX: University of Texas, 1999, [pp. 1-4; pp. 21-39; pp. 65-95; pp. 98-126].

Schteingart. <墨西哥城>，《都市时代第二卷: 巨型城市》. Dogan and Kasarda. Newbury Park编辑, CA: Sage 出版社, 1988, pp. 268-293.
Schteingart. “Mexico City.” In The Metropolitan Era Volume 2: Mega-Cities. Edited by Dogan and Kasarda. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1988, pp. 268-293.

Rosan, and Davis, Christina. “¡No Al Aeropuerto en Texcoco!区域与社区决定动员: 墨西哥城新机场的选址.” 《硕士论文》, 麻省理工学院城市研究与规划系, 2002.
Rosan, and Davis, Christina. “¡No Al Aeropuerto en Texcoco! Regional Decision-Making and Community Counter mobilization: The Siting of Mexico City’s New Airport.” Masters in City Planning Thesis, submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning: MIT, 2002.


第四单元：鹿特丹
UNIT IV: Rotterdam.

<交叉组织者2000的边界>,《边境故事：阿姆斯特丹边境发生了什么》, NL: Agora Europa.
“Borders to Cross Organisers 2000.” The Border Story: What Happened at Borders to Cross. Amsterdam, NL: Agora Europa.

Schön. <调查的理论：杜威关于教育的遗赠>,《调查课程》 22, no.2 (1992).
Schön. “The Theory of Inquiry: Dewey’s Legacy to Education.” Curriculum Inquiry 22, no.2 (1992).

Evans. <更多宜居城市的政治策略>，《宜居城市：城市为宜居和可持续性发展的奋斗》. Evans编辑. 伯克利,加州大学出版社, 2002, pp. 222-246.
Evans. “Political Strategies for More Livable Cities.” Livable Cities: Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability. Edited by Evans. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2002, pp. 222-246.

《变革中的城市》. Graafland and Hauptman. Rotterdam编辑: 010 出版社, 2001.
Cities in Transition. Edited by Graafland and Hauptman. Rotterdam: 010 Publishers, 2001.
- Graafland. <导论:变革中的城市>, [pp. 30-35].
- Graafland. “Introduction: Cities in Transition.” [pp. 30-35].
- de Bruijn. <鹿特丹港口：鹿特丹城市与港口的融合>, [pp. 70-80].
- de Bruijn. “The Port of Rotterdam: Synthesis between Rotterdam City and Mainport.” [pp. 70-80].
- Maas. <项目：港口城市, 1999.> [pp. 122-127].
- Maas. “Project: Port City, 1999.” [pp. 122-127].
- Meyer. <作为公共领域的港口>, [p. 160-167].
- Meyer. “The Port as Public Domain.” [p. 160-167].
- Brusse. “Sea Wall 之后的混乱：对Dirk Frieling的采访”,[pp. 378-386].
- Brusse. “Chaos behind the Sea Wall: Interview with Dirk Frieling.” [pp. 378-386].
- Priemus. <荷兰最近城市政策的改变>, [pp. 388-403].
- Priemus. “Recent Transformations in Urban Policies in the Netherlands.” [pp. 388-403].

《都市读者》. LeGates and Stout 编辑. 英国伦敦: Routledge, 1996.
The City Reader. Edited by LeGates and Stout. London, UK: Routledge, 1996.
- Sassen. <新的地理边缘和中心：概要和应用>,《世界经济中的城市》(1994): pp. 69- 74.
- Sassen. “A new geography of centers and margins: summary and implications.” Cities in a World Economy (1994): pp. 69- 74.
- Castells. <空间潮流中社会含意的重建>,《信息城市》 (1989): pp. 493-498.
- Castells. “The reconstruction of social meaning in the space of flows.” The Informational City (1989): pp. 493-498.

Healy. <协作规划：碎片社会中的成片场所>,《规划传统》的第一章. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 1997, pp.7-30.
Healy. “Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies.” Chapter 1 of Traditions of Planning Thought. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, 1997, pp.7-30.

Laws, Susskind, Anderson, Chapman, Rubenstein and Vagadama. <大众企业家网络>，《环境技术与公共政策项目》，麻省理工学院城市研究与规划系(2001).
Laws, Susskind, Anderson, Chapman, Rubenstein and Vagadama. “Public Entrepreneurship Networks.” Environmental Technology and Public Policy Program. Department of Urban Studies and Planning, MIT (2001).


第五单元
UNIT V

Guttenberg..<美国规划史上的重要事件>,《规划教育与研究》 7, no. 1 (1987).
Guttenberg. “Some important facts in the history of American planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 7, no. 1 (1987).

Rodwin and Sanyal. <规划的表白：变化，想象和挑战：1950-2000.>New Brunswick, NJ: 城市政策研究中心 (2000).
Rodwin and Sanyal. “The Profession of City Planning: Changes, Images and Challenges: 1950-2000.” New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research (2000).