MIT OpenCourseWare

教学大纲


本页翻译进度

灯号说明

审定:无
翻译:张凯婷(简介并寄信)
编辑:陈盈(简介并寄信)


讲座

每周2节
每节1.5小时

导师

Prof. M. Cummings
Prof. R. J. Hansman

指定教材

Wickens, C. D., and J. G. Hollands. 《工程心理学与人类表现》第三版。 Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 2000. ISBN: 0321047117.

课程主题

这是一门探讨人类监督基本议题的研究所课程,包含与复杂动态系统的互动与不同层次的自动化调节。这门课将探索人类如何与各种复杂的自动化系统进行互动、在复杂的人机系统中将面临的决策历程,以及如何设计自动化系统以增进人类的优点和辅助其缺点。几个不同主题的个案研究将以简报方式进行解说,这门课的另一个重点是提供机会改进口头报告和写作的技巧。

团体简报作业

选定一个伙伴后,学生必须从清单中选择一个主题,并准备一个10~15分钟课堂简报,主题是关于相关意外的历史背景。特别应该着重在自动化系统衍生问题的议题和建议。

飞航相关的自动化意外

  • 01.DC-10 以CWS模式降落, 1992年12月21日, Faro机场, 葡萄牙
  • 02.中华航空波音747, 1985年2月19日, 300 NM NW,旧金山
  • 03.DC-10 超越跑道, 1984年2月8日, JFK,
  • 04.波音747未经允许滚动, 1996年2月19日, 多伦多, 安大略
  • 05.空中巴士320 意外, 1988年6月26日, Mulhouse-Habsheim 法国
  • 06.空中巴士320 降落意外, 1992年1月20日, Strasbourg, 法国
  • 07. 空中巴士300 降落意外, 1994年4月26日, 名古屋, 日本
  • 08.空中巴330 起飞意外, 1994年6月30日, Toulouse, 法国
  • 09. 空中巴士320 降落意外, 1990年2月14日, Bangalore, 印度
  • 0.空中巴士320 降落超出跑道, 1993年9月14日, 华沙机场, 波兰
  • 11.美国航空1016班机 go-around, 1994年7月2日, 夏洛特市, 北卡
  • 2.美国航空965班机, 1995年12月20日, Cali, 哥伦比亚
  • X13.X-15 适性控制, 1967年11月15日, Delamar Dry Lake, NV

其它自动化相关意外

  • 01.华盛顿铁道列车对撞, 1996年1月6日, Shady Grove, 马里兰
  • 02.Therac-25, 1985 年六月到1987年1月
  • 03.巡洋舰导弹误击, July 3, 1988, 波斯湾
  • 04.伦敦救护服务计算机协助派遣问题1992年10月
  • 05. 导管释放危险液体, May 23, 1996, Gramercy 路易斯安那
  • 06.Royal Majesty号轮船搁浅, June 10, 1995, Nantucket, Massachusetts

评分根据

ACTIVITIES PERCENTAGES
团体简报 10%
期中简报 10%
文献回顾 10%
期末书面报告 30%
口头报告 20%
平时参与 20%
总和 100%


学术诚实之政策

I这门课主张高学术道德标准,秉持麻省理工宣告的政策:“学术或非学术生活中的独立学习和专业成长建立在要求诚实与正直的基础上,…作弊、抄袭、未经授权的分工和其它形式的不正直行为被认为是严重过错而将受到惩处。”尤其在这门课中,团体专题可以分工合作方式进行,但是学期专题和其它相关工作则是个人的工作。所有的参考文献应恰当的引用(APA格式),包括报告呈现的网站、图片、图表。假如有任何疑问欢迎与课程主持人联系释疑。


Lectures

Two sessions / week
1.5 hours / session

Instructors

Prof. M. Cummings
Prof. R. J. Hansman

Required Text

Wickens, C. D., and J. G. Hollands. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 2000. ISBN: 0321047117.

Course Objectives

This is a graduate student class designed to examine the fundamental issues of human supervisory control, wherein humans interact with complex dynamic systems, mediated through various levels of automation. This course will explore how humans interact with automated systems of varying complexities, what decision processes can be encountered in complex man-machine systems, and how automated systems can be designed to support both human strengths and weaknesses. Several case studies will be presented from a variety of domains as illustrations. A secondary objective of this class is to provide an opportunity to improve both oral and written presentation skills.

Group Presentation Assignment

After selecting a partner, students should select a topic from the list below and prepare a 10-15 minute presentation on the history of the incident for an in-class presentation. Special attention should be given to the issues surrounding the problems with automated systems and recommendations.

Aviation-Related Automation Accidents

  • DC-10 landing in CWS mode, December 21, 1992, Faro Airport, Portugal
  • China Airlines Boeing 747, February 19, 1985, 300 NM NW of San Francisco
  • DC-10 overrun, February 8, 1984, JFK, New York
  • B-747 uncommanded roll, February 19, 1996, Toronto, Ontario
  • A320 accident, June 26, 1988, Mulhouse-Habsheim France
  • A320 approach accident, January 20, 1992, Strasbourg, France
  • A300 approach accident, April 26, 1994, Nagoya, Japan
  • A330 takeoff accident, June 30, 1994, Toulouse, France
  • A320 approach accident, February 14, 1990, Bangalore, India
  • A-320 landing overrun, September 14, 1993, Warsaw Airport, Poland
  • USAIR Flight 1016 go-around, July 2, 1994, Charlotte, NC
  • American Airlines Flight 965, December 20, 1995, Cali, Colombia
  • X-15 Adaptive control, November 15, 1967, Delamar Dry Lake, NV

Other Accidents with Automation Issues

  • Washington Metro train collision, January 6, 1996, Shady Grove, MD
  • Therac-25, June 1985 through January 1987
  • USS Vincennes, July 3, 1988, Persian Gulf
  • London Ambulance Service computer aided dispatch problem, October 1992
  • Pipeline release of hazardous liquid, May 23, 1996, Gramercy LA
  • Grounding of the ship Royal Majesty, June 10, 1995, Nantucket, Massachusetts

Grade Basis

ACTIVITIES PERCENTAGES
Group Presentation 10%
Mid-term Presentation 10%
Literature Review 10%
Final Written 30%
Final Oral 20%
Participation 20%
Total 100%


Academic Honesty Policy

It is expected that within this course, the highest standards of academic integrity will be maintained, in keeping with MIT's stated policy: "Fundamental to the principle of independent learning and professional growth is the requirement of honesty and integrity in conduct of one's academic and nonacademic life…. Cheating, plagiarism, unauthorized collaboration, and other forms of academic dishonesty are considered serious offenses for which disciplinary penalties can be imposed." Specifically in this class, collaboration is allowed for the group project but the term projects and related efforts are individual efforts. All referenced work should be appropriately cited (APA format), to include websites, as well as figures and graphs in presentations. If there are any questions whatsoever, feel free to contact the course instructors about any possible gray areas.